|| ||Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>|
|| ||Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-AT-oracle.com>|
|| ||Re: Yet more ARM breakage in linux-next|
|| ||Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:46:29 -0800|
|| ||rusty-AT-rustcorp.com.au, rmk+lkml-AT-arm.linux.org.uk,
|| ||Article, Thread
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:37:44 -0800
Randy Dunlap <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > (Yes, classic useless kerneldoc documentation doesn't actually *say*
> > this clearly).
> oh fud. That's not a fault of kernel-doc, just of whoever wrote it.
> It's only as good as someone makes it.
For some reason, the act of typing in some kerneldoc makes people's
brains turn off. Perhaps it's because "oh, I am supposed to type some
documentation here" instead of "gee, I think this code is unclear,
let's clarify that".
to post comments)