Fedora 11 release schedule set
From: | "Jon Stanley" <jonstanley-AT-gmail.com> | |
To: | fedora-devel-announce-AT-redhat.com | |
Subject: | Fedora 11 Feature Process reminders | |
Date: | Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:49:06 -0500 | |
Message-ID: | <da159fda0812032149r1ea8d92fx1a73b957022c4f8__6186.6230135367$1228370053$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
At today's FESCo meeting, the final schedule for Fedora 11 was approved. Now it's time for some reminders about the feature process for Fedora 11. We're changing a few things this time around to hopefully make the whole process run smoother than ever! First., FESCo will be making decisions regarding dropping incomplete features at the meeting *2 weeks before* the freeze date, in order to give rel-eng and QA time to implement whatever contingency plans might be required prior to the freeze. For Fedora 11, these dates are: Alpha freeze: 1/20 - FESCo meeting - 1/8 Beta Freeze: 3/10 - FESCo meeting - 2/25 Final Freeze: 4/14 - FESCo meeting - 4/1 Also, note that feature freeze is on 3/3, a week prior to the Beta freeze. This was done in order to provide more time for testing between feature freeze and beta freeze, and fix any issues that come up without having to break the beta freeze. By the time of the Alpha freeze, features must have a defined specification (i.e. the scope section of the template must be complete). This should include criteria of what is required in order to declare the feature a "success", for example, you're able to adjust the volume in a variety of ways (name those ways) and that they have the desired effect for the VolumeControl feature currently scheduled for F11. By the time of the beta freeze, features must have a complete test plan, and be in a testable state. A test plan is NOT simply "use it and see if it works". Steps that can be reproduced by someone that has little to no knowledge of your feature area, but a basic understanding of Fedora and the command line, etc. is what's required here. Taking the VolumeControl feature, there should be instructions that tell me what packages need to be installed, what they're expected to do under various circumstances, and how to make them do those things. By final freeze, obviously the feature must be fully implemented and ready to go out the door. Also, as feature owners have features that are nearing completion, I would encourage them to contact either myself or James Laska in order to schedule a "test day" for that feature. In the past, these have been incredibly successful in getting test coverage and exposure for features that may not otherwise get it. The earlier in the process that this can happen, the better. I will be handling the QA items that are new to this release, John Poelstra will continue in his role as the overall Feature Wrangler. All of this is designed to ensure a high-quality release, and minimize any schedule slips. Thanks! -Jon _______________________________________________ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list Fedora-devel-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-anno... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Posted Dec 5, 2008 1:34 UTC (Fri)
by sbergman27 (guest, #10767)
[Link]
I really wish there were a RH-centric, middle of the road distro, with a predictable 12 month release cycle, and about 25-30 months of update support. Mr. Santa, bring me a dream. ;-)
Posted Dec 5, 2008 7:43 UTC (Fri)
by tajyrink (subscriber, #2750)
[Link]
I can imagine Fedora 11 to perhaps have eg. Gallium architecture, while possibly Mesa 7.4 will be released with traditional DRI, but now with GEM support for the "rest of the gang". Of course Fedora 10 already has Mesa snapshot with GEM support (or is it the Intel's 2008q3 branch). Again Gallium would certainly be something that is very, very leading edge where others don't probably have the resources or the talent to actually implement in a supported release before next autumn.
It's no wonder there are delays in Fedora schedules, among other reasons, since such a leading edge features are not as predictable as using mostly stable releases or at least pre-releases with known schedules. I just hope they also consider the stability, since it'd be sad for Fedora to lose users because of being too cutting edge.
(btw, is it here where the zillions of other-distro fanboys referred in the other, longer comments thread were supposed to be)
Posted Dec 7, 2008 5:48 UTC (Sun)
by proski (subscriber, #104)
[Link]
Fedora 11 release schedule set
Fedora 11 release schedule set
It would be really nice to have several cross-compilers packaged for popular architectures, such as PowerPC, ARM, SPARC, MIPS. I know, there is a cross-compiler for ARM, but it's named in a confusing way and took me time to be found.
Cross-compilers