By Jonathan Corbet
December 10, 2008
For some years now, the Python development community has been talking about
"Python 3000," the far-future release which would allow a complete
rethinking of the language to fix the various annoyances which had built up over
time. On December 3, that talk came to fruition with the
Python 3.0 release. This
release is the end result of a great deal of thought and development; it
represents the vision Guido van Rossum and company have for the language
into the indefinite future. Now that it's out, the Python community as a
whole appears to have stopped for a "now what?" moment.
The wider Python development community appears to be split into three camps on Python 3.0;
the situation amusingly resembles the classic folk tale "Goldilocks and the
three bears." One set (the "too large" crowd) seems to think that an
incompatible version of Python should never have been released, that
languages should stay compatible forever. Another group ("too small") can
handle the idea of an incompatible transition, but thinks that the Python
community should have added more shiny features to the language while they
were at it. And, of course, there's a "just right" crowd taking the
position that the changes in Python 3 are just about as they should
be. See this
discussion by James Bennett for a well-argued description of the "just
right" position.
Time will tell which position is closest to reality. If the "too large"
group is right, Python 3 (or Python in general) will fade away as
developers, unhappy with the break, move to a language they like better.
If Python 3 is too small, there will be strong pressure for a
Python 4 in the too-near future. Your editor, though, thinks that the
Python community has come pretty close to getting it right. Things that
truly needed to be fixed got fixed, but the Python developers resisted the
temptation to try to do too much. They watched, from a safe distance, what
happened with the Mozilla rewrite and Perl 6, and wisely concluded
that their lives - and the lives of those who use Python - would be better
if they avoided a similar experience. So they limited their goals and were
able to get the job done in a reasonable amount of time.
Except, of course, that the job is not really done. To begin with, the
presence of a few difficulties with the 3.0 release should not surprise
anybody. The developers forgot to remove the deprecated cmp()
function, with the result that newly-converted code may come to depend on
it. There are some performance issues. A couple of other features are not
working quite right. Getting Unicode truly straightened out may take a
while yet - a problem which is certainly not unique to Python. The list
seems to be quite short given that this is a
major release of a complex programming language, but there are still things
to fix. So there will almost certainly be a 3.0.1 release before the end
of the year, and a 3.0.2 in (approximately) February.
Meanwhile, the Python hackers have made it clear that the 2.x version of the language
will be supported for some years yet. Version 2.6, available now,
includes a number of features aimed at making the eventual port to 3.0
easier. As the porting projects get serious, other ways to help that
process will become clear; there will be an eventual 2.7 release which
incorporates those lessons wherever possible. A 2.8 release further down
the road has not been ruled out. The current plan seems to be to maintain
Python 2.x for at least the next three years.
[PULL QUOTE:
For many Python developers, it is not yet really time
to make the jump to 3.0.
END QUOTE]
That is good because, for many Python developers, it is not yet really time
to make the jump to 3.0. The core language appears to be in
reasonably good shape, but a language like Python involves much more than
the core. Most non-trivial code makes heavy use of the wide variety of
Python libraries, and, at this point, many or most of those libraries do
not support Python 3. So, now is a good time for library maintainers
to be looking at moving to 3.0, but application developers who try to
port their code now are likely to run into frustration. Porting smaller
programs or subsystems as an exercise in learning the new language may make
sense, but complex application porting probably cannot happen for a little
while yet.
What distributors should be doing is another question. So far, it would
appear that only Fedora is having a (public) discussion on how to handle
the Python 3 transition - see this
thread - and they don't really know what they are going to do yet.
Fedora's maintainers, it seems, would prefer to stay with Python 2 for
the indefinite future; the chances of Python 3 making an appearance in
Fedora 11 are quite small. There is a strong wish to avoid
maintaining both 2.x and 3.x on the same distribution release; they would
rather make a clean switch.
Your editor suspects that the flag-day approach to the language transition
is not going to work. There are a lot of packages which need to be ported,
and many of the people doing the porting would appreciate support from
their distributor. Red Hat dragged its feet for a long time on the
transition to Python 2, with the result that many users had to build
and install the newer version of the language themselves. For Fedora to do
the same with Python 3 is a sure path toward user frustration.
That said, keeping both versions of the language around is not a task for
the faint of heart. Installing a different version of Python itself is
quite easy. Keeping a whole set of modules for multiple versions is
distinctly less so. This will be especially true for Fedora; some other
distributions (especially the Debian-derived ones) have better mechanisms
for (and experience in) maintaining multiple versions of core system tools.
So the reluctance on the part of the Fedora developers to take on this work
is thus unsurprising. Perhaps this would be a good opportunity for offers
of help from the wider Fedora community.
It may well take a couple of years, but this transition will eventually be
made and people will eventually wonder what all the fuss was about. And,
when it's done, we'll have a cleaner, more maintainable, more
Unicode-rational version of an important programming language to work
with. That, one hopes, will be worth the short-term pain involved in
getting there.
(For more information, see the Python3000 FAQ,
currently under development).
Comments (18 posted)
By Jake Edge
December 10, 2008
The KDE office application suite, KOffice is getting closer to its 2.0
release. Beta 3 was announced
November 19, with another beta due any day. The final release is expected
early next year, so it seems like a good time to take it for a spin.
The beta releases are available for Kubuntu
Intrepid Ibex (8.10), making it relatively easy to try out. There are
also openSUSE and Debian packages available as well as source code (of
course). The author didn't look forward to trying to build KOffice on his
normal Fedora 9 desktop, so borrowing an Intrepid laptop from the wife was in
order; after that enabling the "Unsupported Updates" and installing the
koffice-kde4 package (which didn't seem to work through the GUI, but
apt-get worked just fine) is all that it took.
The initial impression was a bit rocky as most of the small handful of ODF
files that were
opened caused KOffice to crash. It is a beta, though, so some of that is
to be expected. Trying again with the imminent Beta 4 and filing bugs for
failures should be high on the author's list. The one presentation file
that successfully opened in KPresenter seemed to have lost much of the
formatting that was present in the original, which was also disheartening.
It should be noted that the author is hardly an office suite "power user".
Normally, OpenOffice.org is used for minimal business documents (invoices
mainly), simple spreadsheets (expense reports, football pools), and boring,
bullet-list slides for
presentations (as anyone who has been to one will attest). By and large,
these simple needs are met by OpenOffice, with the added bonus of being
mostly able to open the various Microsoft-format documents that
unfortunately cross the desktop. Any other office suite with similar
capabilities would serve just as well.
Opening spreadsheets in KSpread provided the most reliable experience when
opening existing documents, but there were still a number of problems.
Formulas did not calculate automatically regardless of the auto-recalculate
setting, but the data was there, unlike some of the other document types.
KWord seemed to be unable to open any of the ODF documents tried, crashing
in all cases. One "handy" .doc file opened, but the formatting and
contents were mangled; OpenOffice can reproduce the formatting of that
document pretty well. KWord also crashed on exit from that
document. Perhaps betas are not the place to try opening
existing files.
There clearly are many new features
in KOffice 2.0, but the major ones, porting to KDE4/Qt4 and using the Flake object
library throughout, are infrastructural in nature—they aren't
obvious to users. Much like KDE 4.0, it would appear that KOffice 2.0 is a
launching pad for subsequent releases.
There is an emphasis on a consistent user interface between the various
applications which does stand out when using KOffice. For better or worse,
the OpenOffice interface is fairly consistent between applications as well,
but seems more cluttered, or more poorly organized somehow. Using Flake
everywhere will be a boon to those who are power users as it treats
everything as a "shape" that can be transformed (via scale, rotate, skew) and
moved between any of the separate applications. Vector graphics can
cohabitate with raster graphics and text easily.
Using KOffice 2.0 is fairly straightforward for simple tasks. It is
noticeably slower than OpenOffice on the same hardware. Opening files,
even empty documents seems to take an inordinate amount of time. Even
moving around within KSpread or KWord seemed sluggish.
Presumably these are things that will be fixed, whether that will be in the
next few months or for KOffice 2.1 remains to be seen. This beta gives the
impression of great promise, but not yet a very usable tool.
Of course, there is more to KOffice than just the three applications
mentioned. The database application Kexi is not yet part of the KOffice
2.0 release, nor is the Visio-like flowchart program Kivio. Two drawing
applications, Karbon14 for vectors and Krita for raster graphics have been
released with the beta. Other than a quick startup to see if the interface
was consistent with the rest of the suite—it was—the author
didn't try them. The same goes for KPlato, the project management and
planning application, though it has a rather different look—no
toolboxes on the right hand side—likely because of its very different
needs.
Perhaps unfairly, the author expected a bit more from this beta release.
It would seem there is still a fair amount of work to do before the final
2.0 version, but there are still a few months left. For whatever reason,
previous attempts to use KOffice had always caused the author to quickly
switch back to OpenOffice. Even though there were so many problems, this
KOffice—or more likely 2.1—somehow seems more plausible to
switch to. Another look in a few more months is likely called for.
Comments (18 posted)
December 10, 2008
This article was contributed by Bruce Byfield
Science fiction writer Vernor Vinge is best-known for novels like A
Fire Upon the Deep and Rainbows End, as well as the concept
of The
Singularity -- the idea that, in the next couple of decades, humans
will become or create a super-human intelligence. What is less well-known
is that Vinge has been a free software supporter since the earliest days of
the Free Software Foundation (FSF). He has served several times on the jury
for the FSF Awards and spoke at an FSF-sponsored event held last month in
San Diego to coincide with the LISA conference. As someone who deals
regularly with large scale speculations, Vinge places free software in a
larger historical context. He even speculates that free software may be one
of the factors that will shortly bring about the Singularity.
Part of Vinge's interest in free software is personal. A mathematician and computer scientist, he quickly found that the rise of proprietary software greatly increased the difficulties of teaching.
"When I looked at contracts and user-agreements," he
recalls, "the legalese was extraordinarily intimidating, not just
because it was complicated, but because it actually seemed to restrict
things to the point where it was really difficult to imagine how a student
could follow the agreement and still do a project. So the openness that was
in the GNU General Public License (GPL) was really very, very
welcome." Vinge soon got into the habit of giving students "a
little spiel about the GPL" and encouraging them to license their
projects under the GPL.
"If they did that," he says, "that would mean I would be
able to use their stuff in later projects with other students. And a very
large percentage of students in most classes though it was a cool enough
idea that they actually did use [the GPL] in their projects."
The historical trend to cooperative infrastructure
However, as important as free software may have been to Vinge in his teaching, what seems to interest him the most is placing free software in a broader historical context. Early on, Vinge came to view free software -- and, later on the Internet and social networking applications that it was instrumental in creating -- as part of a historical trend towards creating an increasingly elaborate "infrastructure of trust and cooperation" that increases the rate of technological advance.
Vinge says: "There are business inventions of the last 2000 years
like the widespread use of loans and credit, the use of insurance, the use
of limited liability corporations, all of which involve at least at the
beginning, a leap of trust." To Vinge, free software, the Internet and
social networking are simply the latest extensions to the infrastructure
created from such institutions. What these institutions all have in common
is that they allow people to interact in more creative and productive
ways.
More specifically, he sees free software as the natural and more logical
extension of the insight that had produced the shareware culture a few
years before the start of the GNU Project and the FSF. With
the emergence of the personal computer, entrepreneurs were finding that
"the barriers to entry were so low that you didn't need a lot of the
overhead that was involved in commercial stuff, and you might just be able
to get away with trusting people to pay you. There was much blind feeling
around the concept of producing stuff in some sort of context that was
different from cars."
According to Vinge, what the GPL and the software and institutions that
have grown up around it have produced is "a platform for experimenting with
social invention. In the 20th and 19th century, if you wanted to experiment
with a new infrastructure for people to interact in, in most cases, like
with the railroads, you needed enormous effort. And now -- we can actually
do social experiments -- cooperative experiments -- much more cheaply, and
you can design ways for people to interact based on just the software
guiding what the interactions are like."
Vinge acknowledges that the consequences have not always been beneficial.
"One thing the last ten years have proved is that we seem to be very
bad at thinking how stuff can be abused," he says, no doubt thinking
of such phenomenon as crackers and online predators. "Any time you
can make something a hundred or a thousand times cheaper than it was
before, there are probably side-effects. But there's a tendency when
something works really, really well to push it hard and deliberately avoid
thinking about side-effects."
Still, the main change has been beneficial overall in Vinge's view. In
particular, he says: "One nice thing is that the price of failure is
a lot lower than what you might imagine in the 19th century. Say someone
spent ten million 1850 dollars, to make steam-powered dirigibles. Now, it
doesn't work, and you've just spent a lot of money, and you don't have
anything except a lot of ruined effort. Now, there's still ruined effort if
something doesn't work out, but you can retarget or repurpose much more
easily, and you can justify taking much larger leaps of faith than you
could in 1850." The result is that more experimentation, and more and
quicker development becomes possible.
In this view, free software represents the currently most-advanced
realization of the possibilities inherent in computer technology. "It's an
interesting, science-fictiony, parallel-world story to imagine what would
have happened if Richard Stallman hadn't come along with the GPL," says
Vinge. "Without Richard Stallman's insight, I think we would have
eventually got something like what we got with free software, but it would
have been a very interesting muddle. [The process] could have gone for
years, and it could easily have gone on so many years that it impacted the
era in which really large stuff can be built in the free model. So,
overall, I think we would have got something, but, even now, the low
overhead involved and even the insight that comes from the GPL would not be
with us."
In other words, the GPL and modern computer structures are all "in
the tradition of the last few centuries. They're taking the traditions that
we saw with the industrial revolution and adding several layers of
magnitude to that flexibility."
Bringing on The Singularity
Although speculation is part of Vinge's stock in trade as an SF novelist,
he is cautious about predicting the future. "I always rush to say,
'Terrible things could happen!'" he says. "A giant meteor could hit the
earth, or a civil war could happen."
However, caution aside, Vinge does concede that "we have the tools to
keep running along the same lines for some time. And, in the absence of
disaster, it quickly runs to the point where you're talking about stuff
that's of the same significance as the rise of the human race within the
animal kingdom." In other words, the Singularity arrives.
Vinge does not offer a map of exactly how free software and its
infrastructure will lead to the Singularity. But, given the probable
inability of humans to understand super-human intelligence, he
should not be expected to do so. "It's easy to imagine," he says, "but you
run out of adjectives and high-sounding words that could mean anything to
someone like us." All that can really be said is that, as the latest
manifestation of the historical trend to increasingly complex cooperative
infrastructures, free software plays a large role in creating a future in
which the Singularity becomes increasingly inevitable.
"I think that's going to happen in the relatively near historical
future," says Vinge. "And these sorts of trends are all
consistent with that possibility."
Meanwhile, Vinge is personally content with the improvements that have come
to free software in the last couple of years. He is particularly pleased
that you can download and install a stable and easy to use operating system
in an afternoon. "If you look back over the last ten years, you see how
easy it's become to do things," he says. "It's silly to put number to this,
but it's ten or a hundred times easier now. I can remember spending days
getting PPP to work. And now, you just plug this cable into that socket,
and it works. I feel much more able to do what I have to do without having
to worry very much, without having Catch-22s nibble me to death. Things
have really come together in a coherent and useful way."
Comments (36 posted)
Page editor: Jake Edge
Security
By Jake Edge
December 10, 2008
Removing the ability for regular users to execute "system" programs has a
certain appeal, but does it really provide any extra security? A thread on
the fedora-devel mailing list explores that question in the context of
usermod (and other, similar tools), which had their permissions
changed more than two years ago in an effort to meet security certification
requirements. Whether these changes, and at some level the certifications
themselves, actually increase the security of the system is the open question.
Callum Lerwick noticed that running
usermod no longer worked as a regular user. He has a habit of
doing that to get a quick overview of the command syntax and options from
the help page, but unless he uses sudo, that doesn't work. That
was done on purpose as Steve Grubb describes:
These should have been gone for quite a while...and on purpose. You cannot do
anything with them unless you are root. Allowing anyone even to execute them
would require lots of bad things for our LSPP/CAPP evaluations.
LSPP and CAPP are two protection profiles that are used for Common Criteria
security certifications (such as EAL3) that Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has
earned. Because these tools can modify trusted databases
(e.g. /etc/shadow), attempts to run them by untrusted users must
be added to the audit log in order to comply with the certifications. But
adding audit events requires the CAP_AUDIT_WRITE capability bit; in today's
systems that effectively means setuid(0). As Grubb puts it: "IOW, if we open the
permissions, we need to make these become setuid root so
that we send audit events saying they failed."
Leaving aside the idea that only processes with root
permissions are allowed to generate auditable events—which seems a
bit bizarre—there is still the question of how much protection is
provided by changing the file permissions. Seth Vidal asks:
And do we seriously think we can keep the code away from a non-root user
by chmodd'ing the binaries? A user can get a binary for anything
fedora can install in about 30s w/firefox.
Allowing users to download binaries "takes the
system out of the certified configuration", according to Grubb, "So, if you need to
be in the CAPP
certified configuration, don't let users do this." This fairly
clearly demonstrates the dubious nature of the security afforded by the
current certifications. For the most part, the protection profiles
define away nearly all of the interesting threats that most systems face
today.
To a large extent, CAPP/LSPP certifications are the kinds of things listed
in marketing materials for "enterprise" operating systems rather than
serious attempts to address the real security needs of the vast majority of
network connected systems. Grubb provides an excellent overview of some of the requirements of CAPP,
along with how they are implemented in Fedora
as part
of the discussion. The CAPP
information page gives the full story, however:
The CAPP provides for a level of protection, which is appropriate for an
assumed non-hostile and well-managed user community requiring protection
against threats of inadvertent or casual attempts to breach the system
security. The profile is not intended to be applicable to circumstances in
which protection is required against determined attempts by hostile and
well-funded attackers to breach system security.
But CAPP does require that all attempts to modify trusted databases
like the shadow password file generate an audit trail, so there is a
lower-level audit rule set up for that file. Any access to
/etc/shadow, for example, is logged as Grubb describes in his
overview. That, though, begs other questions as Lerwick points out:
So we *are* auditing low level filesystem calls? So then what, other
than security theater, does auditing execution of usermod gain us?
The answer is that auditing execution of usermod by non-root users
gains exactly one thing: CAPP compliance. It requires that binaries which
modify trusted databases leave an audit trail. Even though any actual
attempt to access the underlying file will be logged, just accessing the
binary that could modify the file is also something that must be
logged.
Part of the dismay displayed in the thread comes from the fact that Fedora
will probably never be certified with CAPP for any number of reasons. So
taking away longstanding user abilities, though there are reasonable
alternatives like man usermod, for a certification that won't be
done, doesn't sit well with some in the Fedora community. Though, as Jef
Spaleta notes, there might be a use for the
certification in a Fedora spin:
Is there need for certified
'appliance' situations that a new 3rd party could leverage Fedora to
create? I can imagine all sorts of no network software appliance
situations where the CAPP certification applies and a Fedora derived
image would be a good development target.
There is always going to be tension between the security needs of an
"enterprise" distribution like RHEL and a more user/desktop-oriented
distribution like Fedora. While the specific reduced functionality in this
case is fairly minimal, the discussion increased the visibility of the
auditing required for certification as well as what that means for both
distributions. The original decision was made back in the Fedora Core days
when there was much less visibility and community input into the process.
Discussions like this will only help continue the process of opening up
Fedora while also exposing some of the inadequacies of security
certifications.
Comments (26 posted)
Brief items
The PHP 5.2.7 release
has been
withdrawn because it introduced a security hole. PHP users are advised
to drop back to version 5.2.6 until the developers can put together a 5.2.8
update.
Update: PHP 5.2.8 is now
available.
Comments (18 posted)
New vulnerabilities
Archive::Tar: directory traversal
| Package(s): | Archive-Tar |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2007-4829
|
| Created: | December 10, 2008 |
Updated: | July 22, 2010 |
| Description: |
The Archive::Tar perl module, prior to version 1.40, suffers from a directory traversal vulnerability exploitable via a specially-crafted tar file. |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
awstats: fix incomplete fix for CVE-2008-3714
| Package(s): | awstats |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-5080
|
| Created: | December 8, 2008 |
Updated: | October 13, 2009 |
| Description: |
From the Red Hat bugzilla entry:
It was discovered that the upstream patch for cross-site scripting (XSS) issue
in awstats known as CVE-2008-3714 does not completely resolve the problem and
it still allows injection of quote characters.
|
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
clamav: denial of service
| Package(s): | clamav |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-5314
|
| Created: | December 4, 2008 |
Updated: | December 24, 2008 |
| Description: |
clamav has a denial of service vulnerability. From the Debian advisory:
Ilja van Sprundel discovered that ClamAV contains a denial of service
condition in its JPEG file processing because it does not limit the
recursion depth when processing JPEG thumbnails (CVE-2008-5314). |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
compiz-plugins: illegal access to desktop
| Package(s): | compiz-plugins |
CVE #(s): | |
| Created: | December 9, 2008 |
Updated: | December 10, 2008 |
| Description: |
From the Ubuntu advisory: It was discovered that the Expo plugin for Compiz
did not correctly restrict the screensaver window from being moved with the
mouse. A local attacker could use the mouse to move the screensaver off
the screen and gain access to the locked desktop session
underneath. Default installs of Ubuntu were not vulnerable as Expo does not
come pre-configured with mouse bindings. |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
dbus: security bypass
| Package(s): | dbus |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-4311
|
| Created: | December 8, 2008 |
Updated: | April 21, 2009 |
| Description: |
From the freedesktop.org advisory
Joachim Breitner discovered a mistake in the default configuration for the
system bus (system.conf) which made the default policy for both sent and
received messages effectively *allow*, and not deny as intended.
|
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
java: arbitrary code execution
| Package(s): | java |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-2086
|
| Created: | December 4, 2008 |
Updated: | November 18, 2009 |
| Description: |
Java has an arbitrary code execution vulnerability.
From the Red Hat alert:
A vulnerability was found in in Java Web Start. If a user visits a
malicious website, an attacker could misuse this flaw to execute arbitrary
code. (CVE-2008-2086) |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
java-1.6.0-openjdk: multiple vulnerabilities
Comments (none posted)
kernel: buffer overflow
| Package(s): | linux-2.6.24 |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-5134
|
| Created: | December 5, 2008 |
Updated: | February 4, 2009 |
| Description: |
The Kernel has a buffer overflow vulnerability. From the
national vulnerability database entry:
Buffer overflow in the lbs_process_bss function in drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c in the libertas subsystem in the Linux kernel before 2.6.27.5 allows remote attackers to have an unknown impact via an "invalid beacon/probe response." |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
kernel: denial of service
| Package(s): | linux-2.6.24 |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-5300
|
| Created: | December 5, 2008 |
Updated: | November 4, 2009 |
| Description: |
The kernel has a denial of service vulnerability. From the
national vulnerability database entry:
Linux kernel 2.6.28 allows local users to cause a denial of service ("soft lockup" and process loss) via a large number of sendmsg function calls, which does not block during AF_UNIX garbage collection and triggers an OOM condition, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-5029. |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
kernel: privilege escalation
| Package(s): | linux-2.6.24 |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-5182
|
| Created: | December 5, 2008 |
Updated: | February 25, 2009 |
| Description: |
The kernel has a privilege escalation vulnerability. From the
national vulnerability database entry:
The inotify functionality in Linux kernel 2.6 before 2.6.28-rc5 might allow local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors related to race conditions in inotify watch removal and umount. |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
kernel: denial of service
| Package(s): | kernel |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-5079
|
| Created: | December 9, 2008 |
Updated: | October 5, 2009 |
| Description: |
From the CVE entry: net/atm/svc.c in the ATM subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.27.8 and earlier allows local users to cause a denial of service (kernel infinite loop) by making two calls to svc_listen for the same socket, and then reading a /proc/net/atm/*vc file, related to corruption of the vcc table. |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
lcms: buffer overflows
| Package(s): | lcms |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-5316
CVE-2008-5317
|
| Created: | December 10, 2008 |
Updated: | January 8, 2009 |
| Description: |
The lcms color management utility suffers from a couple of buffer overflow vulnerabilities which could be exploited via a specially-crafted image file. |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
mgetty: insecure use of tmp file
| Package(s): | mgetty |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-4936
|
| Created: | December 8, 2008 |
Updated: | December 10, 2008 |
| Description: |
From the Gentoo advisory:
Dmitry E. Oboukhov reported that the "spooldir" directory in
fax/faxspool.in is created in an insecure manner.
A local attacker could exploit this vulnerability to overwrite
arbitrary files with the privileges of the user running the
application.
|
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
apache: multiple vulnerabilities
| Package(s): | apache |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2007-6420
CVE-2008-2364
CVE-2008-2939
|
| Created: | December 5, 2008 |
Updated: | December 7, 2009 |
| Description: |
The Apache web server has multiple vulnerabilities.
From the Red Hat vulnerability report:
A flaw was found in the mod_proxy module. An attacker who has control of
a web server to which requests are being proxied could cause a limited
denial of service due to CPU consumption and stack exhaustion. (CVE-2008-2364)
A flaw was found in the mod_proxy_ftp module. Where Apache is configured
to support ftp-over-httpd proxying, a remote attacker could perform a
cross-site scripting attack. (CVE-2008-2939)
A cross-site request forgery issue was found in the mod_proxy_balancer
module. A remote attacker could cause a denial of service if
mod_proxy_balancer is enabled and an authenticated user is targeted.
(CVE-2007-6420) |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
ruby: denial of service
| Package(s): | ruby |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-4310
|
| Created: | December 5, 2008 |
Updated: | December 10, 2008 |
| Description: |
ruby has a denial of service vulnerability.
From the Red Hat security advisory:
Vincent Danen reported, that Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2008:0897
did not properly address a denial of service flaw in the WEBrick (Ruby
HTTP server toolkit), known as CVE-2008-3656. This flaw allowed a
remote attacker to send a specially-crafted HTTP request to a WEBrick
server that would cause the server to use excessive CPU time. This
update properly addresses this flaw. (CVE-2008-4310) |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
squirrelmail: cross-site scripting
| Package(s): | squirrelmail |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-2379
|
| Created: | December 8, 2008 |
Updated: | May 13, 2009 |
| Description: |
From the Debian advisory:
Ivan Markovic discovered that SquirrelMail, a webmail application, did not
sufficiently sanitise incoming HTML email, allowing an attacker to perform
cross site scripting through sending a malicious HTML email. |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
syslog-ng: chroot jail escape
Comments (none posted)
vim: information exposure
| Package(s): | vim |
CVE #(s): | CVE-2008-4677
|
| Created: | December 4, 2008 |
Updated: | March 24, 2009 |
| Description: |
The vim editor has an information exposure vulnerability.
From the Mandriva alert:
A vulnerability was found in certain versions of netrw.vim where it
would send FTP credentials stored for an FTP session to subsequent
FTP sessions to servers on different hosts, exposing FTP credentials
to remote hosts (CVE-2008-4677). |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
vinagre: format string flaw
| Package(s): | vinagre |
CVE #(s): | |
| Created: | December 8, 2008 |
Updated: | December 11, 2008 |
| Description: |
From the Ubuntu advisory:
Alfredo Ortega discovered a flaw in Vinagre's use of format strings. A
remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability if they tricked a user
into connecting to a malicious VNC server, or opening a specially crafted
URI with Vinagre. |
| Alerts: |
|
Comments (none posted)
Page editor: Jake Edge
Kernel development
Brief items
The current 2.6 development kernel is 2.6.28-rc8,
released on December 10. 2.6.28-rc8 contains
another fairly long list of fixes, including some for fairly important
regressions.
Linus also notes (in the 2.6.28-rc8 announcement) that he's trying to
figure out whether to release 2.6.28 before or after the holidays. He asks
for suggestions, of which, one assumes, he will get plenty.
The current stable 2.6 kernel is 2.6.27.8, released on December 5.
This is a large update with fixes for a wide variety of problems.
Comments (3 posted)
Kernel development news
For some reason, the act of typing in some kerneldoc makes people's
brains turn off. Perhaps it's because "oh, I am supposed to type
some documentation here" instead of "gee, I think this code is
unclear, let's clarify that".
--
Andrew Morton
I personally don't like kerneldoc at all, because the truth is that
people will work on fixing bugs and other useful things before
keeping kerneldoc up to date.
And that's the basic fact which cannot be denied.
I wish it could work, but it doesn't across the board. So unless
we have dedicated monkeys scouring over every single patch that
goes into the tree and doing the necessary kerneldoc updates,
kerneldoc will be chronically wrong somewhere.
That leads to confusion and lost developer time. Because if the
kerneldoc bits are wrong, it's worthless.
--
David Miller
I expect better: You never see me hard with time word making
sentence coherent stuff. Ever.
--
Rusty Russell
As usual: You shall never rely on the source code comments, they
will only mislead you.
--
Manfred Spraul
Comments (16 posted)
The Kernel Miniconf at linux.conf.au next January is looking for a speaker
or two to fill out the schedule. "
Presentations do not have to be limited to a slide deck. If you have an
idea for a 50-minute session that follows a non-traditional format, it
will be considered."
Full Story (comments: none)
By Jonathan Corbet
December 9, 2008
It has been just over four years, now, since
the realtime discussion got
serious and the realtime preemption patch set got its start. During
that time, your editor has heard many predictions for when the bulk of the
realtime work would be merged; generally, the guess has been "within about
a year." While a lot of realtime work
has been merged, some of the
core components of the realtime tree remain outside of the mainline.
Beyond that, the realtime developers have been relatively quiet over the
last year - at least on the realtime front. Having taken on some little
side tasks - unifying the x86 architecture and maintaining it going
forward, for example
- some of those developers have been just a little bit distracted recently.
The realtime patch set has not gone away, though. If nothing else, the
fact that a number of distributors are shipping this code is enough to
ensure continued interest in its development. So your editor noted with
interest the recent announcement
of a new -rt tree with an updated set of realtime patches. This tree
will be of interest for anybody wanting to look at the realtime work in the
context of the 2.6.28 kernel or beyond.
One of the core technologies in the realtime tree is a change to how
spinlocks work. Spinlocks in the mainline will busy-wait until the
required lock becomes available; they thus occupy the processor to no
useful end when acquiring a contended lock. Holding a spinlock will also
prevent a thread from being preempted. This behavior is generally best for
system throughput; it also makes it easier to write correct code. But
anything which prevents a CPU from immediately servicing the
highest-priority process runs counter to the chief design goal of a
realtime operating system: providing deterministic response times in all
situations. So, for the realtime patches, classic spinlocks had to go.
The solution was to turn most spinlocks into a form of mutex with priority
inheritance. A process which attempts to acquire a contended "spinlock"
will no longer spin; instead, it goes to sleep and waits for the lock to
become free, making the processor available to another thread. Code which
holds one of these non-spinlocks is no longer immune to preemption; a
higher-priority thread can always push it out of the way. By changing
spinlocks in this way, the realtime hackers were able to eliminate one of
the largest sources of latency in the mainline kernel.
Much of that work found its way into the mainline some time ago in the form
of the mutex API, but spinlocks themselves have not been changed in the
mainline.
To minimize the pain of maintaining the realtime patches, the
developers simply redefined the spinlock_t type to be the new
mutex type instead. Except that, as it turns out, some spinlocks in
low-level parts of the kernel really do need to be spinlocks still. So
those were switched to a new raw_spinlock_t type - but without
changing the various spin_lock() calls. Instead, some truly
frightening macro trickery was introduced to cause the spinlock API to do
the right thing when passed either of two entirely different mutual
exclusion primitives. This bit of macro magic was always going to be an
impediment to mainline inclusion, so the realtime developers never really
expected to merge the lock code in that form.
The new realtime tree now shows how the realtime developers think this work
might get into the mainline. It involves a more explicit separation of the
two types of "spinlocks" - and a lot of code churn. In the realtime tree,
most locks of type spinlock_t are changed to a new lock_t
type. There is a new set of operations for this type:
#include <linux/lock.h>
lock_t lock;
acquire_lock(&lock);
release_lock(&lock);
For a normal, non-realtime kernel build, lock_t will be the same
as spinlock_t, and things will work as they always have. On
realtime kernels, instead, lock_t will be a mutex type. The other
variants of the spinlock API will be represented in the new API (there is
an acquire_lock_irqsave(), for example), but none of them will
actually disable interrupts in a realtime kernel. Meanwhile,
spinlock_t will remain a true spinlock type.
This change gets rid of the tricky macros, but at the cost of changing the
declarations of and operations on almost all spinlocks in the kernel. That
is a lot of code changes: a quick grep turns up over 20,000
spin_lock*() calls in the upcoming 2.6.28 kernel. That will make
for some pain if and when this change is merged. But in the mean time, it
can only make for a lot of pain for the people who have to maintain
this patch out of tree. To make their lives a little easier, the realtime
developers have created a couple of scripts to do the bulk of the work.
First, all spinlocks in a pristine kernel are converted to lock_t,
then the few locks which truly must be spinlocks are switched back. This
work is kept in a separate branch which is regenerated when needed; in this
way, the realtime developers avoid the need to do nasty merges to keep up
with current kernels.
Your editor has heard talk of another locking change which does not, yet,
appear in this tree. One problem with the realtime patch set is that it
requires distributors to create yet another kernel build - something they
hate doing - if they want to
support realtime operation.
In an effort to make life easier for distributors, the
realtime developers are working on a scheme whereby a kernel would
determine at run time whether it should be running in a realtime mode. If
so, spinlocks will be changed to sleeping locks by patching the kernel
binary as it boots. Kernels built this way will be able to run efficiently
in either mode.
The branches of the realtime tree provide a quick guide to the other parts
of the realtime work which remain outside of the mainline. The threaded interrupt handler code
is one example; that change could be proposed (again) for merging in the
near future. The priority
workqueue mechanism sits in another branch, as do patches aimed at Java
support, filesystem changes, memory management changes, and more. Then,
there's a branch for stuff which will never be merged; for example, there
is this
patch which gives Java programs direct access to physical memory - not
something which strikes most kernel developers as a good idea. All told,
there is a great deal of work sitting in the realtime patch set; this work
is finally being organized into a proper git tree.
The "upstream first" policy says that vendors should merge their code
upstream before shipping it to customers. The 2.6.x development model is
built on the idea that no change is too fundamental to be accepted into a
regular, 3-month development cycle. The realtime patches would appear to be
an exception to both rules. It has taken over four years to get to a point
where some of the fundamental realtime technologies are close to ready for the mainline,
but distributors have been shipping it for at least three of those years.
It has, in other words, been one of the biggest forks of the Linux kernel,
ever. The plan has always been to join this fork back with the mainline,
though; perhaps, finally, that goal is getting closer. With luck, it will
happen within about a year.
Comments (6 posted)
By Jake Edge
December 10, 2008
The Linux boot process, at least as provided by distributions,
depends on help from user space, with
drivers being loaded as required from the initial filesystem (initramfs/initrd).
Loading drivers requires using tools built into initramfs and
if those tools break, the kernel won't boot. But when a working kernel
configuration and initramfs are used with a new kernel, the result
is expected to be a kernel that successfully boots. When that doesn't
happen, bugs are filed regarding kernel regressions but, as a recent
example shows, the actual problem may be elsewhere.
The original report was made in late
October, but no progress was made until Evgeniy Polyakov saw it again in early December. The symptom
was a kernel that hangs after printing:
request_module: runaway loop modprobe char-major-5-1
four times on the console. Since nothing in the user space (initramfs)
or kernel configuration had changed, it seemed to clearly point to
something in the
kernel itself.
It turns out that the "runaway loop" message is meant to indicate that the
request_module() function has been invoked recursively. So in an
effort to load the driver for the character device with major/minor numbers
5/1—which corresponds to
/dev/console—request_module() was invoked again.
The code in kernel/kmod.c:
if (atomic_read(&kmod_concurrent) > max_modprobes) {
/* We may be blaming an innocent here, but unlikely */
if (kmod_loop_msg++ < 5)
printk(KERN_ERR
"request_module: runaway loop modprobe %s\n",
module_name);
atomic_dec(&kmod_concurrent);
return -ENOMEM;
}
only allows that message to be printed four times, but the invoker should
recognize the
ENOMEM and handle it appropriately.
The root cause was that something in the kernel was trying to access
/dev/console before that device was registered in the kernel.
This led the kernel to try and load a module to handle
/dev/console, which will fail. Because of the failure, something
in the user space
modprobe then tries to access /dev/console, presumably to
output an error message, which repeats the kernel module loading process.
And so on.
After that recurses enough to exceed the max_modprobes limit,
request_module() will produce the runaway loop message and return
ENOMEM which should put a stop to the whole process.
In an acrimonious thread—and kernel bug
report—Alan Cox, Kay Sievers, and Polyakov tried to
determine where the problem came from and what to do about it. It didn't
help matters that they were using different distribution's initramfs
so that they saw different behavior. Polyakov/Sievers were using Debian
user space while Cox was using Fedora. Something in the Debian version was
continuing to try to open /dev/console even after getting
ENOMEM. This leads to an infinite loop, thus a kernel hang.
Sievers eventually tracked it to the kernel cryptographic API:
It is caused by:
"modprobe cryptomgr" called from swapper[1]
This modprobe process does try to log an error, accesses /dev/console,
which is not initialized in the kernel at that time, and the kernel
module loader tries the load a module to support dev_t 5:1, which
again runs modprobe, and ...
Setting CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER=y makes it disappear.
It turns out that the crypto layer attempts to load the cryptomgr module as
part of its algorithm testing infrastructure. If cryptomgr fails to load,
the algorithm registration code can continue without it. It is optional,
but modprobe wants to put out a message when it fails to load it,
which leads to the runaway loop. As Herbert Xu points out, though, the problem is not
crypto-specific at all:
In any case the loop itself does not involve any crypto components
so I don't think making changes in the crypto layer is going to
make this go away forever as anyone calling request_module early
enough will get into this loop.
It is this potential pitfall that Sievers and Polyakov would like to see
removed. In
general, user-space programs are not required to be concerned with the
availability of /dev/console—except when they are run from
early kernel initialization. But Cox points out that user-space helpers must
concern themselves
with avoiding loops because there are multiple possible ways to cause that
to happen.
As an example, he notes that if UNIX-domain sockets (AF_UNIX) are in a
module and syslog() is called before the module is loaded, a
similar loop will occur.
In an effort to "step back" from the arguments that were going back and
forth, Ted Ts'o offers his analysis of the
problem along with a suggested course of action:
There is a dispute about whether it is looping forever, or whether it
should be getting caught by kernel/kmod.c's modprobe recursion
detector. Alan has checked the recursion detector and reports that it
works just fine; Evgeniy and Kay are claiming that it in fact loops
forever, and the recursion detector is not working.
[...] So I would think the best thing to do is to figure out what Debian's
initrd is doing that is evading the recursion detection. Fixing that
is going to make things much more robust.
Clearly the recursion detector is working to some extent, or the runaway
loop messages would not be seen, but on Debian, at least, that detection
doesn't stop the problem. Ts'o's theory is that something outside of
directly invoked helper is actually the culprit: "I'm guessing why
it isn't working given Debian's initrd setup is that whatever is
ultimately opening /dev/console isn't being called until after the
helper script has exited." That seems worth tracking down as Ts'o
points out in a later message:
It would be good to make sure we understand what
the root causes for while the modprobe recursion detector is
apparently not triggering, since it could be that Debian's initrd
might cause some other uncaught recursion loop if we don't drive this
problem determination to root cause.
The exact cause of the problem and why Debian and Fedora behave differently
is still not known. Digging into Debian's initrd to figure that out, as
Ts'o suggests, is clearly the right starting point. That answer will
likely lead to sensible fixes, either in user space or the
kernel—possibly both.
Bickering about where and how to fix the problem before it is fully
understood seems counter-productive at best.
Comments (7 posted)
By Jonathan Corbet
December 9, 2008
Low-level optimization of performance-critical code can be a challenging
task. At this point, one assumes, the potential for algorithmic
improvements in the targeted code has been realized; what is left is trying
to locate and address problems
like cache misses, mis-predicted branches, and so on. Such problems can be
impossible to find by just looking at the code; one needs support from the
hardware. The good news is that contemporary hardware provides that
support; most processors can collect a wide range of performance data for
analysis. The bad news is that, despite the fact that processors have been
able to collect that data for many years, there has never been support for
this kind of performance monitoring in the mainline kernel. That situation
may be about to change, but, first, the development community will have to
make a choice between a venerable out-of-tree implementation and an
unexpected competitor.
The "perfmon" patch set has been under development for some years, but, for
a number of reasons, it has never found its way into the mainline kernel.
The most recent version of the patch was posted for review by
Stéphane Eranian in late
November. The perfmon patches show the signs of all those years of
development work and
usage experience; they offer a wide set of features and extensive user-space
support. The full perfmon patch adds twelve system calls to the kernel;
the posted version, though, trims that count back to five in the hope that
a narrower interface will have a better chance of getting into the
mainline. The additional system calls, one assumes, will be proposed for
inclusion sometime after the perfmon core is merged.
The reduced interface is described in the
patch set; briefly, an application hooks into the performance
monitoring subsystem with a call to:
int pfm_create(int flags, pfarg_sinfo_t *regs);
This system call returns a file descriptor to identify the performance
monitoring session. The regs parameter is used to return a list
of performance monitoring registers available on the current system;
flags is currently unused.
Specific performance counter registers can be manipulated with:
int pfm_write(int fd, int flags, int type, void *d, size_t sz);
int pfm_read(int fd, int flags, int type, void *d, size_t sz);
These system calls can be used to write values into registers (thus
programming the performance monitoring hardware) and to read counter and
configuration information from those registers.
Actually doing some performance monitoring requires a couple more calls:
int pfm_attach(int fd, int flags, int target);
int pfm_set_state(int fd, int flags, int state);
A call to pfm_attach() specifies which process is to be monitored;
pfm_set_state() then turns monitoring on and off.
There are a couple of distinctive aspects to the perfmon interface. One is
that it knows almost nothing about the specific performance monitoring
registers; that information, instead, is expected to live in user space.
As a result, the bare perfmon system call interface is probably not
something that most monitoring applications would use; instead, those
system calls are hidden behind a user-space library which knows how to
program different types of processors for the desired results. Beyond
that, perfmon uses the ptrace() mechanism to stop the monitored
process while performance counters are being queried; as a result, the
monitoring process must have the right to trace the target process.
On December 4, Thomas Gleixner and Ingo Molnar posted a surprise announcement of a new
performance counter subsystem. The announcement states:
We are aware of the perfmon3 patchset that has been submitted to
lkml recently. Our patchset tries to achieve a similar end result,
with a fundamentally different (and we believe, superior :-)
design.
This is not the first time that these developers have shown up with an
out-of-the-blue reimplementation of somebody else's subsystem; other
examples include the CFS scheduler, high-resolution timers, dynamic tick,
and realtime preemption. Most of the time, the new code quickly supplants
the older version - an occurrence which is not always pleasing to the
original developers - but the situation does not seem quite as
straightforward this time.
The proposed interface is much simpler,
adding a single system call:
int perf_counter_open(u32 hw_event_type, u32 hw_event_period,
u32 record_type, pid_t pid, int cpu);
This call will return a file descriptor corresponding to a single hardware
counter. A call to read() will then return the current value of
the counter. The hw_event_period can be used to block reads until
the counter overflows the given value, allowing, for example, events to be
queried in batches of 1000. The pid parameter can be used to
target a specific process, and cpu can restrict monitoring to a
specific processor.
There are a few advantages claimed for the new implementation. The
simplicity of the system call interface is one of those; it is possible to
write a very simple application to perform monitoring tasks, with no
additional libraries required. The second version of the patch
includes a simple "kerneltop" utility which can display a
constantly-updated profile of anything the performance counting hardware
can monitor. Another advantage is the avoidance of ptrace(); this
reduces the amount of privilege needed by the monitoring process and avoids
perturbing the monitored process by stopping and restarting it. The
management of counters is said to be more flexible, with facilities for
sharing counters between processes and reserving them for administrative
access. The low-level hardware interface is said to be simpler as well.
Those claimed advantages notwithstanding, a
number of complaints have been raised with regard to the new performance
monitoring code. Two of those seem to be at the top of the list: the
single counter per file descriptor API, and programming the hardware
performance monitoring unit inside the kernel. On the API side, the
biggest concern is that putting each counter behind its own file descriptor
makes it very hard to correlate two or more counters. Reading two counters
requires two independent read() system calls; as is always the
case, just about anything could happen between those two calls. So it's
hard to tell how two different counter values relate to each other. But
that sort of correlation is exactly what developers doing performance
optimization want to do. Paul Mackerras says:
Your API has as its central abstraction the "counter". I am saying
that that is the wrong abstraction. The abstraction really needs
to be a set of counters that are all active over precisely the same
interval, so that their values can be meaningfully compared and
related to each other.
In response, Ingo argues that the loss of
precision caused by independent read() calls is small - much
smaller than the muddying of the results caused by stopping the target
process so that all of the counters can be read at the same time. That
argument does not appear to have convinced the detractors, though.
The other complaint is that moving the counter programming task into the
kernel requires that the kernel know about the complexities of every
possible performance monitoring unit it may encounter. This hardware sits
at the core of the most performance-critical CPU subsystems, so its design
parameters value non-interference above features or a straightforward
programming interface. So programming it can be a complex business,
involving sizeable tables describing how various operations interact with
each other. The perfmon code keeps those tables in a user-space library,
but the alternative implementation won't allow that. Quoting Paul again:
Now, the tables in perfmon's user-land libpfm that describe the
mapping from abstract events to event-selector values and the
constraints on what events can be counted together come to nearly
29,000 lines of code just for the IBM 64-bit powerpc processors.
Your API condemns us to adding all that bloat to the kernel, plus
the code to use those tables.
Paul (and others) argue that this information - which can add up to
hundreds of kilobytes - is better kept in user
space.
There also seems to be a bit of concern over the fact that Stéphane had clearly never heard about this work before it was
posted for review. It must, indeed, be a shock to work on a subsystem for
years, then find a proposed replacement sitting in one's mailbox. As David
Miller put it:
And also, another part of the backlash is that the poor perfmon3
person was completely blindsided by this new stuff. Which to be
honest was pretty unfair. He might have had great ideas about the
requirements (even if you don't give a crap about his approach to
achieving those requirements) and thus could have helped avoid the
past few days of churn.
So, at this point, what will happen with performance monitoring is unclear
at best. Perhaps, though, this discussion will have the effect of raising
the profile of performance monitoring, which has been without proper kernel
support for many years. The merging of either solution - or, perhaps, a
combination of both - seems like it has to be an improvement over having no
support at all.
Comments (25 posted)
Patches and updates
Kernel trees
Core kernel code
Development tools
Device drivers
Documentation
Filesystems and block I/O
Memory management
Networking
Architecture-specific
Security-related
Virtualization and containers
Benchmarks and bugs
Page editor: Jake Edge
Distributions
News and Editorials
By Rebecca Sobol
December 10, 2008
LWN has received several emails regarding bugs in Fedora. These are
serious bugs that can prevent you from installing new updates, or new
packages of any kind. Fedora users may want to be aware of the following and, perhaps, wait until things settle down a bit.
The start things off, bug #475068
was reported for Fedora 9 with x86_64. This bug is present in Fedora 10
and also affects x86 systems. There was a workaround
for this bug, for Fedora 10 users, involving using yumdownloader
to install an older version of dbus. Unfortunately the older packages
won't show up on all mirrors. It is still possible
to recover from this bug by manually editing /etc/dbus-1/system.conf
and rebooting the system. Fedora 9 users will need this
version of PackageKit. For Fedora 10 you'll want this
version of PackageKit.
Bug
#475069 covers a dbus access problem with bluez. If you are seeing the
error message: "Agent registration failed: A security policy in place
prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, see
message bus configuration file (rejected message had interface
"org.bluez.Adapter" member "RegisterAgent" error name "(unset)" destination
"org.bluez").", this may
help. Fedora 9 users will want bluez-utils-3.36-3.fc9.
Fedora 10 users should grab bluez-4.22-2.fc10.
If you are still running Fedora 8 the proper package to get is bluez-utils-3.35-5.fc8.
Another bug that may be troubling you is bug #469434,
in which subnetmask settings are not saved. For some people this has been
fixed. That fix did not seem to work for everyone though. The system-config-network-1.5.94-2.fc10
update does seem to work.
If you run into the error "PackageKit failed to get a TID" you will want to
see this
forum thread which affected several people on December 7, 2008. So
far, no fix seems to be forthcoming.
Bugs in PackageKit are especially troubling for some, since you can't
install an update using the GUI tools. Your editor completed a fresh
install of Fedora 10 last weekend on an aging Thinkpad laptop. After the
usual update she could no longer find or update any packages. A manual
yum update did not help. It would appear that bug #475656
addresses the error "failed to get a TID: A security policy in place
prevents this sender from sending this message to this
recipient...". No doubt a SELinux expert could edit the offending
policy. The rest of us will have to wait for a fix.
Editors note: as noted in the comment below, this is a DBus security problem and has nothing to do with SELinux. This last bug was reported December 9, and by December 10 a fix was already being tested.
Comments (9 posted)
New Releases
Omega is a Fedora remix suitable for desktop and laptop users. It is a
installable Live CD for regular PC (i686 architecture) systems. It has all
the features of Fedora 10 and a number of additional multimedia players and
codecs by default. You can play any multimedia content (including MP3) or
commercial DVD's out of the box. The preview release is available for
download.
Full Story (comments: none)
Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex) has
been
optimized for the XO laptop. This version uses the kernel from OLPC
release 8.2.0. USB boot fix in ramdisk is the only change that was applied
to OLPC-distributed files. There are many other optimizations to make
Ubuntu work on this OLPC laptop.
Comments (none posted)
Distribution News
Debian GNU/Linux
Debian has a new FTP team member, Frank Lichtenheld. That should help with
that particular bottleneck. "
Ok, now, stop hating us and go on, fix
RC bugs and help Lenny please. :)"
Full Story (comments: none)
Fedora
The Fedora project has approved the
Fedora 11
release schedule. It appears that
the proposal to lengthen this
development cycle was adopted in the end; Fedora 11 is
currently scheduled for release on May 26, 2009. Work has begun on
the proposed
feature list, but that list can be expected to grow considerably over
the next month or two.
Full Story (comments: 3)
The Unofficial Fedora FAQ has been updated for Fedora 10. There are lots
of new changes and additions. "
With the combination of Fedora 10 and
the new RPMFusion repository, there doesn't need to be a special
fedorafaq.org yum configuration anymore! There are still instructions in
the FAQ on how to configure yum to access rpmfusion, though."
Full Story (comments: none)
Elections are underway for several seats in the Fedora Advisory Board,
Fedora Ambassadors and the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. The
closing date for voting is December 20, 2008. "
The two appointed
seats on the Board are nominated by Red Hat and chosen by the FPL. One
appointment is held back until after the elections so that the Board's
composition can be balanced as needed. The balance of the appointments are
announced before elections." Chris Aillon will return to the Board
as an appointee. See this post for more
voting
information.
Full Story (comments: none)
Gentoo Linux
Gentoo had an open seat on the council. Tiziano Müller (dev-zero) was
chosen to join the current Gentoo Council for term 2008/2009.
Full Story (comments: none)
SUSE Linux and openSUSE
It is now possible to
pre-order
the openSUSE 11.1 release, currently scheduled for December 18.
But interested parties may also want to look at
this status report posted to the mailing
list. "
The status of 11.1 is pretty short: it's cursed." It
seems that the release managers have been running into some difficulties
and will be scrambling to make that release date.
Comments (2 posted)
If you are in the Nuremberg (Nürnberg) area and interested in testing
SUSE Studio click below for more information.
Full Story (comments: none)
New Distributions
Ubuntu Privacy Remix (UPR) is a
modified live CD based on Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. UPR is not designed for
installation on a hard drive, instead it provides an environment where
private data can be dealt with safely and securely. "
The risk of
theft of such private data arises not only from "conventional" criminals,
trojans. rootkits, keyloggers etc. In many countries, measures are taken or
being prepared aiming at spying and monitoring its citizens. Ubuntu Privacy
Remix is a tool to protect your data against unsolicited access."
UPR 8.04 r1 was released December 4, 2008. This is the first stable
version and features a new kernel, minor bugfixes and the DTP program
Scribus.
Comments (none posted)
Distribution Newsletters
The
DistroWatch
Weekly for December 8, 2008 is out. "
This week's feature story
takes a first look at VectorLinux 6.0 beta 2. Following up on last week's
feature story about the impact of the global financial crisis on Linux
distributions, Mandriva CEO Hervé Yahi responds to the community regarding
the recent dismissals at the Paris-based distribution while Novell posts
mixed sales results for SUSE Linux. In other news, Phoronix publishes the
results of benchmark tests comparing the performance of the newly released
OpenSolaris 2008.11 with the previous version, 2008.05, Ars Technica names
Foresight Linux and openSUSE as its distributions of the year, and
DragonFly BSD gets a closer look. Finally, we get progress updates on Linux
Mint 6 and a preview release of Fedora-based Omega 10 Desktop."
Comments (none posted)
This issue of the Developer News includes CD/DVD images for Lenny, License
AGPL v3.0 is suitable for main, Building CD/DVD images made easier, Mono
2.0 transition in progress, SOAP interface to the PTS, Tracking GCC 4.4
related build errors, and Mirror of git repositories on Alioth.
Full Story (comments: none)
The Fedora Weekly News for December 7, 2008 is out. "
FWN is pleased
to announce the return of the Planet Fedora beat. Among other items Adam
Batkin lists some "Howtos and Tips" gleaned from blogs. In Announcements
the "Fedora 11" naming scheme is discussed. In Developments "The PATH to
CAPP" exposes disquiet with some security infrastructure. Translation
provides updates on the cancellation of FLSCo elections. Artwork is again
bursting at the seems with a "T-Shirt Logo Design Tool" and "Improved
Document Templates". SecurityAdvisories lists this week's essential
updates. Finally Virtualization continues to race the shocking pace of
developments including the "Release of libvirt 0.5.0 and 0.5.1" There's
plenty more a mere mouse click away!"
Full Story (comments: none)
The
November
edition of the Gentoo Monthly Newsletter is out, with the latest Gentoo
news.
Comments (none posted)
This issue of the
openSUSE Weekly
News covers: Andreas Jaeger: openSUSE 11.1 Goes RC2, Joe Brockmeier:
Mounting remote directories using FUSE and sshfs on openSUSE, Henne
Vogelsang: What's Working Well and What To Do With It, RedDwarf: Check your
multimedia problem in ten steps, arstechnica.com: Distro(s) of the Year:
OpenSUSE and Foresight, and several other topics. Click below for links to
several translations.
Full Story (comments: none)
The Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter for December 6, 2008 covers: Ubuntu Free
Culture Showcase, Jono Bacon on UDS, MOTU, Tamil Team - Intrepid
introduced at Udhagamandalam, Ubuntu Zimbabwe, Launchpod #13, Meet
Henning Eggers, Launchpad hiring bug tracker, Ubuntu Podcast #14,
Vibuntu 1.0, Lazy Linux: 10 essential tricks for admins., Ilumina TV
runs on Ubuntu, George Wright responds to backstage questions(Video),
and much more.
Full Story (comments: none)
Distribution reviews
Linux.com
reviews
Smoothwall Express. "
SmoothWall Express 3.0, from August 2007, is an
open source firewall distribution released under the GNU General Public
License (GPL). It provides all the features commonly found in a modern
system, but also a few that you might not expect. Stateful inspection,
dynamic and static NAT, egress controls, demilitarized zone (DMZ)
segmentation, and a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) server are
de rigueur in today's world. However, this package adds a selection of
proxy servers for the Web (content filtering is available in the commercial
editions), POP3 mail, Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), Domain Name System
(DNS), and instant messaging. You can configure the proxies to further
protect networks with antivirus scanning and forensic logging, and Snort
intrusion-detection software is built in for logging suspicious
events. However, real-time alerting via email or SMS text messages is not
available on the Express version. SmoothWall also features a simple quality
of service (QoS) management that business and home users alike should find
valuable."
Comments (none posted)
Page editor: Rebecca Sobol
Development
By Forrest Cook
December 10, 2008
GanttProject
is an open-source cross-platform Java application that can be used
to generate
Gantt charts
for the management of projects. Different components of
GanttProject have been
released
under the GPL and Apache licenses.
The project is described:
GanttProject is a free and easy to use Gantt chart based project scheduling and management tool. Our major features include:
Task hierarchy and dependencies, Gantt chart, Resource load chart,
Generation of PERT chart, PDF and HTML reports,
MS Project import/export, WebDAV based groupwork.
The learn about
document explains more of the project's features and
some
screen shots
show some examples of what an older version of GanttProject looks like.
Version 2.0.8 of GanttProject was recently
announced:
The major improvement in GanttProject 2.0.8 is that task web links now appear in PDF and HTML exports. Besides, those who use filesystem paths as web links, now can specify relative path to a file from .gan file location. GanttProject 2.0.8 also includes a few bugfixes and localization improvements for Croatian, Japanese and Colombian users.
Installation of GanttProject 2.0.8 on an Ubuntu 8.04 system was
fairly straightforward. The software was
downloaded and unzipped.
The prerequisite Sun Java Runtime Environment was
downloaded
and installed.
The ganttproject.sh startup file was given execute status and
run, the application started up as expected.
GanttProject is easy to figure out. There are top-level tabs for
creating charts and resources (people). Tasks can be added, assigned
date ranges and a variety of other attributes. Tasks can be tied to
other prececessor tasks and assigned to people.
It only took a few minutes of poking around the software to create a
new project, produce a simple Gantt chart and output a PostScript
file that was suitable for printing.
GanttProject is not alone in its ability to generate Gantt charts
under Linux.
Planner is a
project management tool for the GNOME desktop environment and
TaskJuggler is yet
another project management tool. Both of these applications
have a broader project management scope.
If your needs only require generating Gantt charts, GanttProject
is a straightforward application that can be used to easily
produce professional looking results.
Comments (none posted)
System Applications
Database Software
Version 6.0.8 Alpha of the MySQL DBMS has been announced.
"
MySQL 6.0 includes two new storage engines: the transactional
Falcon engine, and the crash-safe Maria engine."
Full Story (comments: none)
The December 7, 2008 edition of the PostgreSQL Weekly News
is online with the latest PostgreSQL DBMS articles and resources.
Full Story (comments: none)
Version 0.9.9 of SQLObject, an object-relational mapper, has been announced.
"
I'm pleased to announce version 0.9.10, a minor bugfix release of 0.9 branch
of SQLObject."
Full Story (comments: none)
Version 0.10.4 of SQLObject, an object-relational mapper, has been announced.
"
I'm pleased to announce version 0.10.4, a minor bugfix release of 0.10 branch of SQLObject."
Full Story (comments: none)
Fossbazaar has posted
slides
and audio (MP3) from a talk by Josh Berkus comparing MySQL and PostgreSQL.
Josh, of course, is a PostgreSQL hacker, and that shows through, but it
seems like a good talk regardless.
Comments (4 posted)
Interoperability
Version 3.3.0rc1 of Samba has been
announced.
"
This is the first release candidate of Samba 3.3.0. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only."
Comments (none posted)
Security
Version 0.2.3 of Nebula has been
announced.
"
Nebula automatically generates intrusion signatures from attack traces. It runs as a daemon accepting attack submissions from honeypots.
This release of the nebula intrusion signature generator introduces several bugfixes and improvements."
Comments (none posted)
Miscellaneous
Version 0.9.8.8 of Octopussy has been
announced.
"
Logs Analyzer, Alerter & Reporter with a Web Interface
* Major bugfix on octo_dispatcher ! (Bug ID: 2343806)
* Bugfix the apache2 restart bug (Bug ID: 2304276)
* You can now limit the number of minutes to search for restricted users
* Minor WebUI improvements".
Comments (none posted)
Desktop Applications
Audio Applications
Version 2.0 of the Amarok music manager has been
released. "
We
thought about how to best design a program that would allow us to stay at
the cutting edge of digital music management. We also sought to distinguish
Amarok in an increasingly saturated market of music players. To achieve
this we took the best ideas from the 1.x series, and brainstormed what else
we could do to help our users 'rediscover music'. And then we started
developing." There's a lot of new features and a completely
redesigned user interface; see the announcement for details and
screenshots.
Comments (29 posted)
Version 2.7.1 of
Ardour,
a multi-track audio editor, has been announced.
"
Its been a busy two weeks since 2.7 was released. Not only has there finally been a working new release of JACK, but Ardour has also seen several major bug fixes, a useful collection of new features, and many smaller fixes that correct annoying behaviour."
Comments (none posted)
Version 0.116.1 of the JACK Audio Connection Kit patched with D-Bus support
has been announced.
"
D-Bus modifications add optional autodetected support for the D-Bus
based server control system.
D-Bus is object model that provides IPC mechanism. D-Bus supports
autoactivation of objects, thus making it simple and reliable to code a
"single instance" application or daemon, and to launch applications and
daemons on demand when their services are needed."
Full Story (comments: none)
Version 0.3.4 of QjackCtl, a GUI control panel for the JACK Audio Connection
Kit, has been announced.
"
At last, after years of retarded
procrastination, the old infamous patchbay
snapshot feature has been the subject of a almost
complete rewrite and it does try to give a way
better mapping of all actual and current running
client/port connections, both JACK (audio, MIDI)
and ALSA MIDI, of course ;)..."
Full Story (comments: none)
Desktop Environments
The following new GNOME software has been announced this week:
You can find more new GNOME software releases at
gnomefiles.org.
Comments (none posted)
The following new KDE software has been announced this week:
You can find more new KDE software releases at
kde-apps.org.
Comments (none posted)
The following new Xorg software has been announced this week:
More information can be found on the
X.Org Foundation wiki.
Comments (none posted)
Educational Software
Version 7.0.007 of TCExam has been
announced.
"
TCExam is a CBA (Computer-Based Assessment) system (e-exam, CBT - Computer Based Testing) for universities, schools and companies, that enables educators and trainers to author, schedule, deliver, and report on surveys, quizzes, tests and exams."
Comments (none posted)
Games
The WorldForge game project has
announced
the availability of Ember 0.5.5.
"
Ember is a 3d client for the WorldForge project. It uses the Ogre 3d graphics library for presentation and CEGUI for its GUI system.
This release introduces a new combined minimap and compass widget, many improvements to the entity creator and an upgrade to the cutting edge Ogre 1.6 3d library."
Comments (none posted)
Interoperability
Version 1.1.10 of Wine has been
announced.
"
What's new in this release (see below for details):
- Support for virtual memory write watches.
- Workarounds for the WINAPI compiler bug on Mac OS.
- Several fixes for the 64-bit build.
- Some more GdiPlus functions.
- Various bug fixes."
Comments (none posted)
Mail Clients
Version 1.4.17 of SquirrelMail, a standards-based webmail package written in PHP, has been announced.
"
The SquirrelMail team is happy to announce the release of version 1.4.17. The
most notable change is a security fix that prevents certain specially-crafted
hyperlinks within messages from executing cross-site scripting attacks. For
other details, see the ReleaseNotes file included in this release. We advise
all users of SquirrelMail software to upgrade."
Full Story (comments: none)
Multimedia
Version 0.5.21 of Elisa Media Center has been announced.
"
New features include:
- A new mechanism to update the media database so as to reflect
gstreamer's improvements at media detection and typefinding
- Ability to publish unstable plugins in the plugin repository and offer
them for testing to advanced users
As usual, a bunch of bugs were fixed".
Full Story (comments: none)
Version 0.4.5 of GPAC has been
announced.
"
Multimedia Framework for MPEG-4, VRML, X3D, SVG, LASeR ...
New version of GPAC is out with many improvements and fixes - try it out!"
Comments (none posted)
Music Applications
Version 0.9.8 of Strasheela has been announced, it features
bug fixes and an improved tutorial.
"
Strasheela is a highly expressive constraint-based music composition
system. Users declaratively state a music theory and the computer
generates music which complies with this theory. A theory is
formulated as a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) by a set of
rules (constraints) applied to a music representation in which some
aspects are expressed by variables (unknowns)."
Full Story (comments: none)
Office Suites
Version 3.0 of Group-Office has been
announced.
"
Take your office online with Group-Office groupware. Share projects, calendars, files and e-mail online with co-workers and clients. Easy to use and fully customizable, Group-Office takes online collaboration to the next level.
After more then one and a half year of development time and testing it's finally there!
We are proud to present Group-Office 3.0, Group-Office needed to be modernised. New web techniques have been developed and are ready to use in a professional platform
such as Group-Office. We completely rewrote the interface of Group-Office. It feels much
more like a desktop application now with drag and drop features, flexible information panels
and much more!"
Comments (none posted)
Web Browsers
Version 3.1 Beta 2 of the Firefox web browser has been announced.
"
Firefox 3.1 Beta 2 is now available for download. This milestone is
focused on testing the core functionality provided by many new
features and changes to the platform scheduled for Firefox 3.1."
See the
MozillaZine announcement for more information.
Full Story (comments: none)
Languages and Tools
C
The November 27, 2008 edition of the GCC 4.4.0 Status Report
has been published.
"
The trunk remains Stage 4, so only fixes for regressions (and changes
to documentation) are allowed.
As stated previously, the GCC 4.4 branch will be created when there
are no open P1s and the total number of P1, P2, and P3 regressions is
under 100. We're close -- there are 5 P1s, and 105 total regressions."
Full Story (comments: none)
Caml
The December 9, 2008 edition of the Caml Weekly News
is out with new articles about the Caml language.
Full Story (comments: none)
Java
Java developer Mark Reinhold
blogs
about the idea of modularizing JDK and other Java components.
"
The JDK is bigand hence it ought to be modularized. Doing so would enable significant improvements to the key performance metrics of download size, startup time, and memory footprint.
Java libraries and applications can also benefit from modularization. Truly modular Java components could leverage the performance-improvement techniques applicable to the JDK and also be easy to publish in the form of familiar native packages for many operating systems.
Finally, in order to realize the full potential of a modularized JDK and of modularized applications the Java Platform itself should also be modularized."
(Thanks to Nicolas Mailhot).
Comments (15 posted)
JSP
Version 3.5.2 of ZK has been
announced.
"
ZK is Ajax Java framework without JavaScript. With direct RIA, 200+ Ajax components and markup languages, developing Ajax/RIA as simple as desktop apps and HTML/XUL pages. Support JSF/JSP/JavaEE/Hibernate/.., and Ajax script in Java/Ruby/Groovy/Python/..
Over 10 new features and 36 bugs fixed. It enables better integration between MVC pattern and data-binding, template page supported. Moreover, ZK Demo is much enhanced, more test cases, easier way of searching, and usability."
Comments (none posted)
Perl
Version 5.8.9 RC2 of Perl has been
announced.
"
This is a maintenance release for perl 5.8.x, providing bug fixes and integrating module updates from CPAN."
Comments (none posted)
PHP
Version 5.2.8 of PHP has been
announced.
"
The PHP development team would like to announce the immediate availability of PHP 5.2.8. This release addresses a regression introduced by 5.2.7 inregard to the magic_quotes functionality, that was broken by an incorrect fix to the filter extension. All users who have upgraded to 5.2.7 are encouraged to upgrade to this release, alternatively you can apply a work-around for the bug by changing "filter.default_flags=0" in
php.ini."
Comments (none posted)
Python
Python 3.0 is out. "
Python 3.0 (a.k.a. 'Python 3000' or 'Py3k') represents a major
milestone in Python's history, and was nearly three years in the
making. This is a new version of the language that is incompatible
with the 2.x line of releases, while remaining true to BDFL Guido van
Rossum's vision." See Guido's
what's new in 3.0
document for an overview of the major changes.
Full Story (comments: 57)
For those who are questioning the value of Python 3.0: James Bennett has
posted
an interesting
discussion on why it is worthwhile. "
It's rare that any
large/established software project manages to overcome this inertia and
actually take stock, figure out whether 'the way we've always done it' is
still a good way to do it, and then make changes in response. This week
Python 3.0 was released, and it represents one of those rare instances:
Python 3.0 was designed to clear up a lot of now-inertial legacy issues
with the Python language and figure out good ways to do things now instead
of unquestioningly sticking with what seemed like good ways (or, more
often, the least painful ways) to do things five or ten years ago."
Comments (36 posted)
Version 2.6.1 of Python has been announced.
"
Hot on the heals of Python 3.0 comes the Python 2.6.1 bug-fix
release. This is the latest production-ready version in the Python
2.6 family. Dozens of issues have fixed since Python 2.6 final was
released in October."
Full Story (comments: none)
The December 8, 2008 edition of the Python-URL! is online with
a new collection of Python article links.
Full Story (comments: none)
Version 0.10 of PyBindGen has been announced, it adds new capabilities
and bug fixes.
"
PyBindGen is a Python module that is geared to generating C/C++ code that
binds a C/C++ library for Python. It does so without extensive use of either
C++ templates or C pre-processor macros. It has modular handling of C/C++
types, and can be easily extended with Python plugins. The generated code is
almost as clean as what a human programmer would write."
Full Story (comments: none)
Version 0.0.30 of Shed Skin has been announced.
"
I have just released version 0.0.30 of Shed Skin, an experimental
(restricted) Python-to-C++ compiler.
Most importantly, this release adds (efficient) support for
user-defined classes in generated extension modules, which should make
it much easier to integrate compiled code within larger projects. More
specifically, compiled classes can now be instantiated on the CPython
side, and instances can be passed freely between CPython and Shed Skin
without any conversion taking place."
Full Story (comments: none)
Test Suites
New versions of STAF and STAX have been
announced.
"
The Software Testing Automation Framework (STAF) is a framework designed to improve the level of reuse and automation in test cases and test environments. The goal of STAF is to provide a complete end-to-end automation solution for testers."
Comments (none posted)
Version Control
Version 1.10 of the Bazaar distributed version control system has been
announced.
"
Bazaar 1.10 has several performance improvements for copying revisions
(especially for small updates to large projects). There has also been a
significant amount of effort in polishing stacked branches. The commands
``shelve`` and ``unshelve`` have become core commands, with an improved
implementation."
Full Story (comments: none)
Version 1.6.0.5 of the GIT distributed version control system
has been announced.
"
Although we are into 1.6.1-rc cycle, we have accumulated enough fixes to
warrant a new maintenance release, so here it is."
Full Story (comments: none)
Page editor: Forrest Cook
Linux in the news
Recommended Reading
Luis Villa has put up
a
thoughtful post on the difficulties of innovating on the Linux
desktop. "
Discussion in this bug about the Sugar filesystem is
fairly typical of what happens when you try to implement radical change-
people used to the old system focus intensely on the transition costs (it
doesn't work RIGHT NOW and my old system WORKS RIGHT NOW DAMMIT) and give
varying levels of thought (usually little) to the potential upside of the
change- maybe tagging and search really have vastly more potential than
hierarchies now that our computers have more capabilities than they did in
the time of Aristotle. Kudos to the Sugar folks for persisting despite that
resistance."
Comments (17 posted)
This
Wired article is about Diebold's proprietary vote-counting software,
but it is an interesting example of how added visibility into a system can
help to find fatal bugs. "
Parke Bostrom, one of the Transparency
Project volunteers, wrote in a blog post about the issue, 'This means the
audit log is not truly a 'log' in the classical computer program sense, but
is rather a 're-imagining' of what GEMS would like the audit log to be,
based on whatever information GEMS happens to remember at the end of the
vote counting process.'" Worth a read. (Via
Felten).
Comments (12 posted)
Doc Searls
writes about the tendency for companies to become
mired in the tracks of their own success.
"
It's strange to think of Google and Facebook as old, but Dave's right. They are. Search is old. Advertising is old. Online social communities in a big walled garden is old. You can look at it this way: Google fixed Lycos's problem. (And Infoseek's, and Hotbot's, and AltaVista's.) And then it fixed the yellow pages' and classified advertising's problems. And it used the proceeds from both to start fixing many other problems too."
Comments (10 posted)
Companies
ZDNet
examines the latest financial report from Novell.
"
Novell's Linux business grew by 33 percent over the fourth quarter last year, according to the company's latest financial figures. Identity and access management revenues were up 11 percent compared to the same period last year, and systems and resource management revenues climbed 15 percent.
The quarterly results, released on Friday, show that just two areas declined. Novell's Workgroup business fell by nine percent, while its services business plunged by 26 percent."
Comments (7 posted)
Linux at Work
CleanTechnica.com has
a quick look at an autonomous solar-powered sailboat that is controlled by Linux. Known as the "Roboat", it won the first World Robotic Sailing Championship. "
The boat also features sensors that track position and speed over ground, speed through water, ultrasonic wind speed, and more. When a destination is set, the Roboats chain-driven motors adjust the mainsail, jib, rudder, and boom."
Comments (none posted)
Legal
Over at Legal Pad (a Fortune magazine sponsored weblog), Roger Parloff
examines
plans for Linux Defenders, an initiative aimed at protecting free
software from software patents and patent trolls. The initiative, which is
going to be announced on December 9, is being
led by the
Open Invention
Network (OIN) and is co-sponsored by the Linux Foundation and
Software Freedom Law Center. "
Linux Defenders will then also see to
it that the publication, duly attributing authorship of the invention to
the developer who submitted it, is filed on the IP.com Web site, a database
used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and other patent examiners
throughout the world when they are trying to determine whether a proposed
patent is truly novel, as any patentable invention is supposed to be."
Comments (8 posted)
Interviews
GnomeDesktop has the second in its series of interviews about Linux multimedia, this time with
Totem developer Bastien Nocera. Totem is the GNOME movie player. "
I was already well chuffed years ago when distributions started adopting Totem as their default movie player. Even though I'm happy to see it mentioned next to such a venerable institution as the BBC, its selection really has more to do with Totem's position as the GNOME movie player, and all the work being done on that desktop (and the underlying frameworks) by all the contributors, rather than just being 'another
movie player'."
Comments (15 posted)
Resources
HowtoForge
takes
a look at storing files in memory, instead of on a hard drive.
"
You probably know that reading from RAM is a lot of faster than
reading files from the hard drive, and reduces your disk I/O. This article
shows how you can store files and directories in memory instead of on the
hard drive with the help of tmpfs (a file system for creating memory
devices). This is ideal for file caches and other temporary data (such as
PHP's session files if you are using session.save_handler = files)
because the data is lost when you power down or reboot the system."
Comments (35 posted)
Reviews
Here's
a
look at Google's Native Client plugin on ars technica. "
Native
Client provides a sandboxed web-embeddable runtime environment for portable
x86 binaries. It also provides a bridge to facilitate communication between
JavaScript and Native Client executables. This makes it possible for
complex web applications to seamlessly leverage native code for
processor-intensive computations." The code is BSD-licensed and
available from
the
Native Client page on Google Code.
Comments (41 posted)
Kevin Bowling
takes a look at
KDE 4.2 on a Gentoo Linux box. KDE 4.2 is currently in beta, set for
release on January 27. "
Much needed features such as changing the
panel height, auto-hide, and screen edge selection have been added. The
task bar is highly configurable in typical KDE fashion, allowing you to
define task grouping, sorting, filtering based on current desktop or screen
or minimized windows only, as well as allowing manual grouping. The system
tray also now allows hiding of unwanted tray icons."
Comments (47 posted)
Page editor: Forrest Cook
Announcements
Non-Commercial announcements
The Electronic Frontier Foundation discusses the legal implications of
a case between Tiffany and eBay.
"
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
along with Public Citizen and Public Knowledge urged a U.S.
court of appeals Wednesday to reject jewelry-maker
Tiffany's attempt to rewrite trademark law and create new
barriers for online commerce and communication.
Tiffany sued the online marketplace eBay, claiming that
eBay should be held liable for trademark infringement when
sellers offer counterfeit Tiffany goods on the eBay site.
The evidence in the case showed that eBay quickly takes
down listings when Tiffany sends notice that it believes a
specific item is not genuine. However, Tiffany wants eBay
to police listings on its own and to be held responsible
for any counterfeit items it missed."
Full Story (comments: none)
The 2008
Perl Advent Calendar
has been
announced.
"
Did anybody yet mention that the Perl Advent Calendar 2008 is live? Take a look: one article a introducing a module that is not as well known as it deserves, per day, until Christmas."
Also, the
Catalyst web framework Advent Calendar is online with daily tips.
Comments (none posted)
Commercial announcements
Appcelerator, Inc. has announced the public preview
release of their Appcelerator Titanium web technology platform.
"
Titanium allows developers to use standard Web technologies such as HTML, CSS and JavaScript to
quickly and easily develop applications that can be deployed to multiple platforms, including the
desktop, the browser or the mobile device. Unlike traditional Web applications, which are limited
to operating within the browser, Titanium desktop applications are able to read and write local
data on the desktop and interact with the operating system."
Full Story (comments: none)
IBM has
announced
the availability of a new desktop offering based on Ubuntu Linux.
"
This solution runs open standards-based email, word processing,
spreadsheets, unified communication, social networking and other software
to any laptop, browser, or mobile device from a virtual desktop login on a
Linux-based server configuration." Only $49/user in quantities of
1,000.
Comments (70 posted)
Redpill Linpro has announced the release of Multiframe version 5
under a GPL license.
"
Redpill Linpro, a leading Nordic vendor of Open Source products
and services, have released the source code for its industry-leading thin client management tool -
Multiframe. The availability of the source code for Multiframe version 5 encourages the Open
Source community to build new features and applications to enhance the capabilities of the software
package."
Full Story (comments: none)
Release Candidate 1 of Renoise 2.0 is available.
"
Renoise has a different approach to making music compared to conventional sequencers, called
Tracking. Tracking comes from the demoscene that pushes technical limits to show off coding skills,
art, and music beyond what is thought possible."
The software is not open-source, but the free demo is fun.
Full Story (comments: none)
New Books
Mark Summerfield has announced his new book
Programming in Python 3.
Full Story (comments: 2)
O'Reilly has published the book
Learning Rails by Simon St. Laurent
and Edd Dumbill.
Full Story (comments: none)
No Starch Press has published the book
Wicked Cool Ruby Scripts by
Steve Pugh.
Full Story (comments: none)
An Official Manual for the Scribus desktop publishing system has been
announced.
"
The long-awaited Scribus Official Manual is in its final stages of production, and we now have a site open for pre-publishing sales. For those who are not already aware, the manual began about one year ago as a collaborative effort. The lead authors, Gregory Pittman and Christoph Schäfer, worked with a number of other contributors on this important project.
The manual represents the most comprehensive source of information about using Scribus, and includes other useful information about DTP, fonts, color management, and more."
Comments (none posted)
Resources
The Free Software Foundation Europe analyzes the conflicts between patents
and standards.
"
Following up on the European Commission's "IPR in ICT Standardisation"
workshop two weeks ago in Brussels, FSFE president Georg Greve analysed
the conflicts between patents and standards. The resulting
paper
is about the most harmful effects of patents on standards, the
effectiveness of current remedies, and potential future remedies."
Full Story (comments: none)
The Free Software Foundation Europe's Freedom Task Force and
GPL-Violations.org have teamed up to produce a
guide
to reporting and fixing license violations. The guide looks at steps
to take as well as resources available for reporting a violation, handling
a violation report, and avoiding violations to begin with. "
Be
careful when reporting a violation. Accusations and suspicions voiced on
public mailing lists create uncertainty and do little to solve
violations. By checking your facts you can help experts resolve violations
quickly." Click below for the press release announcing the guide.
Full Story (comments: 4)
Open World Forum has
announced the
availability of the 2020 FLOSS Roadmap, a
78-page
PDF file describing this group's vision of where free software is
going. "
This is a prospective Roadmap, and a projection of the
influences that will affect FLOSS between now (2008) and 2020, with
descriptions of all FLOSS-related trends as anticipated by OWF contributors
over this period of time. It also highlights all sectors that will,
potentially, be impacted by FLOSS, from the economy to the Information
Society."
Comments (none posted)
Calls for Presentations
Registration
is open for SCALE 7x, the Southern California Linux Exposition.
SCALE will be held on February 20-22, 2009 in Los Angeles, CA.
"
Due to the holidays the Calls For Proposals for SCALE 7x have been extended until December 10th,
2008. The Beginner and Developer tracks are almost full; there are still available spots in the
three general audience speaker tracks. But if you're considering submitting a proposal, don't
delay; the window of opportunity is closing!
OSSIE, the Open Source Software in Education seminar and WIOS, the Women in Open Source seminar
still have open speaker spots in their Friday tracks. Their Calls for Papers close December 31st."
Full Story (comments: none)
Upcoming Events
Events: December 18, 2008 to February 16, 2009
The following event listing is taken from the
LWN.net Calendar.
| Date(s) | Event | Location |
December 27 December 30 |
Chaos Communication Congress |
Berlin, Germany |
January 8 January 11 |
Consumer Electronics Show |
Las Vegas, NV, USA |
January 9 January 11 |
Fedora User and Developer Conference |
Boston, USA |
January 15 January 16 |
Foundations of Open Media Software 2009 |
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia |
January 17 January 23 |
Camp KDE 2009 |
Negril, Jamaica |
January 19 January 24 |
linux.conf.au - penguins march south |
Hobart, Australia |
January 25 January 29 |
Ruby on Rails Bootcamp with Charles B. Quinn |
Atlanta, GA, USA |
January 25 January 28 |
GCC Research Opportunities |
Paphos, Cyprus |
| January 31 |
Greater London Linux Users Group meeting |
London, UK |
January 31 February 3 |
Black Hat Briefings DC |
Arlington, VA, USA |
February 4 February 5 |
DC BSDCon 2009 |
Washington, D.C., USA |
February 4 February 6 |
Money:Tech 2009 |
New York, NY, USA |
February 5 February 9 |
German Perl Workshop |
Frankfurt, Germany |
| February 7 |
Frozen Perl 2009 |
Minneapolis, MN., USA |
February 7 February 8 |
FOSDEM 2009 |
Brussels, Belgium |
February 9 February 11 |
O'Reilly Tools of Change for Publishing |
New York, NY, USA |
| February 15 |
Free Software Awards 2009 Deadline |
Soissons, France |
If your event does not appear here, please
tell us about it.
Mailing Lists
A new python-porting mailing list has been announced.
"
Hi all,
to facilitate discussion about porting Python code between different versions
(mainly of course from 2.x to 3.x), we've created a new mailing list
python-porting@python.org
It is a public mailing list open to everyone. We expect active participation
of many people porting their libraries/programs, and hope that the list can
be a help to all wanting to go this (not always smooth :-) way."
Full Story (comments: 2)
Page editor: Forrest Cook