| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
PythronPythronPosted Dec 4, 2008 4:25 UTC (Thu) by allesfresser (subscriber, #216)In reply to: Pythron by ncm Parent article: Python 3.0 released
I would judge the level of incompatibility as "mostly harmless." :) If you feel the absolute compulsion for a new name, perhaps "Python as it should have been all along" would be a good choice... I heartily applaud the decisions made in this major revision... it'll make my life easier.
(Log in to post comments)
Pythron Posted Dec 4, 2008 4:48 UTC (Thu) by ncm (subscriber, #165) [Link]
I suppose you could change the name of the auld language, instead. May I propose "Pychthon"? (Fhtaghn!)
Pythron Posted Dec 4, 2008 12:09 UTC (Thu) by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989) [Link]
It would be a WASTE to change it to anything but Pynchon.
|
|
||||||||||||