| |||||||||||||
On the future of Perl 5On the future of Perl 5Posted Dec 3, 2008 20:05 UTC (Wed) by jzbiciak (✭ supporter ✭, #5246)In reply to: On the future of Perl 5 by jengelh Parent article: On the future of Perl 5
In fact, C showed oodles of years ago that no variable prefixes are needed at allThat whippersnapper? What about COBOL? Algol? FORTRAN?
(Log in to post comments)
On the future of Perl 5 Posted Dec 4, 2008 0:16 UTC (Thu) by salimma (subscriber, #34460) [Link]
Don't forget Lisp.
On the future of Perl 5 Posted Dec 4, 2008 0:27 UTC (Thu) by jzbiciak (✭ supporter ✭, #5246) [Link]
Can you believe that all of those are 50 years old, except for COBOL, which gets that distinction next year?
|
|||||||||||||