|| ||"Markus Rechberger" <mrechberger-AT-gmail.com>|
|| ||"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab-AT-infradead.org>|
|| ||Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [PATCH] V4L/DVB: Add support for Pinnacle
Dazzle DVC 100|
|| ||Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:11:46 +0200|
|| ||v4l-dvb-maintainer-AT-linuxtv.org, video4linux-list-AT-redhat.com,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien-AT-aurel32.net>|
|| ||Article, Thread
On 10/2/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <email@example.com> wrote:
> Em Ter, 2007-10-02 às 00:26 +0200, Markus Rechberger escreveu:
> > Hi Aurelien,
> > well I still maintain that driver and continue development, I don't
> > want the inkernel driver having code which is not merged with the
> > other work anymore.
> > The reason is if this async way would continue I don't want to drag
> > code from one repository to another one.
> > I gave the possibility to merge the drivers, although I'm not looking
> > at solutions which will decrease the features of the driver, and those
> > comments that I should remove just a little to get the driver in as it
> > is is not right because some fundamental things are not solved and
> > some more specific details are not going to be implemented any time
> > soon into the inkernel driver or even API there.
> > Beside that I don't want to spend any further time in discussions,
> > interested people are welcome to get more information about some parts
> > by directly contacting me (contributions are welcome and discussions
> > which bring things forward too)
> It is quite simple: or you maintain the inkernel driver, using the
> V4L/DVB core infrastructure, or you do whatever you want with userspace
> drivers or at out-of-kernel trees.
> As you've opted to go to the second way, you are not maintaining
> inkernel driver anymore. So, people that want to collaborate to em28xx
> may send em28xx patches to the inkernel driver directly to me, until
> someone else volunteer himself to keep maintaining the inkernel em28xx
as far as you might remember, I started with the em2820 and took
Sascha Sommer's em2800 code. I was the one who contacted you for
merging that code and right why should anyone commit any code to you?
to loose the authority over his project?
There's enough documentation which initially was put up from my side
about that device.
Best would be to replace you as a maintainer since you don't have any
respect of others work either.
Companies should be aware that if they try to submit any code to you
they will loose the authority over _their_ work .. it's simple the
same game that you're playing now.
video4linux-list mailing list
to post comments)