Posted Nov 10, 2008 18:57 UTC (Mon) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)
In reply to: Debian Pure Blends by sladen
Parent article: Debian Pure Blends
There was a lengthy discussion in the name. "remix" was suggested, as well as "spin" , a-la Fedora.
One quality that the name "pure blend" that most other suggestions lacked is that you can easily relate to a blend that is not "pure", that is: (in *this* context) is not fully contained in the Debian Stable distribution.
Historically Debian Pure Blends
Debian Pure Blens is technically a rename if an earlier Debian subproject, the poorly named "Custom Debian Distribution" (cdd, debian-custom). As you can see, the debian-custom list was generated as Apr-2004.
Ubuntu is not such a distribution (that attempts to be part of Debian Stable or at least be compatible to it). Therefore it is simply out of the scope of this.
Posted Nov 10, 2008 19:21 UTC (Mon) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
Fedora does differentiate between "pure" derivatives and otherwise. There are two different terms used within Fedora: Spins and Remixes for this purpose. Refer to the trademark guidelines for details
Spins and Remixes as concepts have been introduced by Fedora during the Fedora 7 days however the trademark guidelines adopting the terminology is relatively recent.