| From: |
| vgoyal@redhat.com |
| To: |
| linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>,
Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp>,
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>,
Satoshi UCHIDA <s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com> |
| Subject: |
| [patch 0/4] [RFC] Another proportional weight IO controller |
| Date: |
| Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:30:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20081106153022.215696930@redhat.com> |
| Cc: |
| fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, menage@google.com,
ngupta@google.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
Hi,
If you are not already tired of so many io controller implementations, here
is another one.
This is a very eary very crude implementation to get early feedback to see
if this approach makes any sense or not.
This controller is a proportional weight IO controller primarily
based on/inspired by dm-ioband. One of the things I personally found little
odd about dm-ioband was need of a dm-ioband device for every device we want
to control. I thought that probably we can make this control per request
queue and get rid of device mapper driver. This should make configuration
aspect easy.
I have picked up quite some amount of code from dm-ioband especially for
biocgroup implementation.
I have done very basic testing and that is running 2-3 dd commands in different
cgroups on x86_64. Wanted to throw out the code early to get some feedback.
More details about the design and how to are in documentation patch.
Your comments are welcome.
Thanks
Vivek
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/