Bilski: What It Means, Part 2 -- Listening to the Dissenting Opinions (Groklaw)
[Posted November 6, 2008 by ris]
Bilski: What It Means, Part 2 -- Listening to the Dissenting Opinions (Groklaw)
[Press] Posted Nov 6, 2008 17:19 UTC (Thu) by ris
Groklaw continues
looking into the Bilski decision. "So let's look now at the
dissenting opinions, as text, so you can give consideration to the point of
view of those who sincerely believe that patents should cover more than
they now can. You'll note that the State Street decision was in 1998. Some
of these justices were sitting on the court at that time. The decision in
State Street was decided by three judges, Giles Sutherland Rich, who passed
away in 1999, and justices Plage and Bryson, still serving. Judge Rich
wrote the decision in State Street, when he was 94 years old. Most of the
16 judges that decided Bilski were serving in 1998, only four of them
having been appointed later than that. You'll see Justice Newman referenced
in one of the footnotes of that State Street decision, footnote 10. So she
is no newbie to patent law."
Comments (none posted)