Hand-counting.
Posted Oct 15, 2008 2:02 UTC (Wed) by
dskoll (subscriber, #1630)
Parent article:
Video and photos show Linux booting on the Brazilian voting machines (BR-Linux.org)
You have to be joking. Have you ever participated in counting ballots by hand? That's the most inaccurate, bug-ridden, and fraud-filled way to count ballots.
That is manifestly false. Do you have evidence to support that?
I have just finished voting in the Canadian general election. Hand-counted paper ballots. We are certainly going to know our results waaaay sooner than the US knew the results of the 2000 election. And there will simply be no question of fraud or funny business except possibly in a very few isolated instances that won't materially affect the outcome. Where votes are close, candidates can request a recount with scrutineers from all parties on hand.
Counting by hand is fast, efficient and accurate. You use a tree-structure of counters, so your time and space requirements scale as O(log N)
For more comments on why e-voting is a terrible idea for democracy, see my comments ("David F. Skoll") at http://www.linuxtoday.com/it_management/2008101402435NWCYPB.
Bottom line: e-voting is snake-oil. Open-source e-voting is open-source snake-oil.
(
Log in to post comments)