| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Interview: Miguel de Icaza (DesktopLinux.com)Interview: Miguel de Icaza (DesktopLinux.com)Posted Oct 10, 2008 2:24 UTC (Fri) by allesfresser (subscriber, #216)In reply to: Interview: Miguel de Icaza (DesktopLinux.com) by dulles Parent article: Interview: Miguel de Icaza (DesktopLinux.com)
You know, there's always KDE...
(Log in to post comments)
Interview: Miguel de Icaza (DesktopLinux.com) Posted Oct 10, 2008 3:53 UTC (Fri) by pradeeps (guest, #53816) [Link]
yes there is KDE(4). But like it or not it is fast loosing to Gnome IMHO.
OTOH may I suggest xfce4 :).
Interview: Miguel de Icaza (DesktopLinux.com) Posted Oct 10, 2008 13:41 UTC (Fri) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]
> But like it or not it is fast loosing to Gnome IMHO.
Well, Google disagrees
http://www.google.com/trends?q=kde%2C+gnome%2C+xfce&c...
Apparently GNOME generates _slightly_ more searches than KDE (since 2006), but that's it. The trend is for both to go slowly down. XFCE is very small in comparison.
KDE v Gnome - statistics Posted Oct 10, 2008 20:20 UTC (Fri) by RogerL (guest, #4046) [Link]
Statistics...
Try to search both of the terms.
There are other gnomes than GNOME... World of Warcraft, Garden...
Interview: Miguel de Icaza (DesktopLinux.com) Posted Oct 10, 2008 8:05 UTC (Fri) by njs (subscriber, #40338) [Link]
Yes, but please, you have to see the dilemma: *they're* obviously freaks because *they* named a desktop environment after the letter *K*. I'm sure you can't provide a logical response to *that* argument.
|
|
||||||||||||