LWN.net Logo

FSF reboots its High Priority list with a grant and call for input

From:  Joshua Gay <jgay-AT-fsf.org>
To:  info-press-AT-gnu.org
Subject:  [GNU/FSF Press] FSF reboots its High Priority list with a grant and call for input
Date:  Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:10:08 -0400
Message-ID:  <20081001211007.GC17339@fsf.org>


FSF reboots its High Priority list with a grant and call for input

BOSTON, Massachusetts, USA -- Wednesday, October 1, 2008 -- The Free
Software Foundation (FSF) today announced a "reboot" of its High
Priority Projects list with an accompanying $10,000 grant from
Worldlabel.com Inc. The grant will seed a new fund to promote projects
on the list, and the FSF is calling for a community conversation about
the biggest challenges computer users face using free "as in freedom"
software.

Russell Ossendryver, owner of <http://www.Worldlabel.com>, said,
"smaller companies and individuals can pool their resources in support
of critical free software projects, but awareness is key. There are
many threats from proprietary software and I wanted to contribute to a
program that can help solve those problems. I am looking forward to
working with the FSF to find creative ways to promote the cause."

FSF campaigns manager Joshua Gay emphasized that the list is not
considered static or complete, and that the FSF is seeking community
input. "The FSF is asking the community of free software users who
understand the critical issues that free software faces to tell us
about the areas where they face problems. Problems that affect the
most users are of the highest priority."

The list is online at <http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/priority-projects/>. 
It includes Gnash, a project to replace Adobe's proprietary Flash
player; Coreboot, a free software replacement for proprietary BIOSes;
a call for a free software replacement for the VOIP and multimedia
chat program Skype; a free software membership and donor transaction
and contact system for non-profit organizations; a free software
replacement for Google Earth; and several more.

While the FSF doesn't itself develop or take credit for these
projects, it seeks to use its position and visibility in the community
to help bring them beneficial help and attention.


  About the Free Software Foundation

The Free Software Foundation, founded in 1985, is dedicated to
promoting computer users' right to use, study, copy, modify, and
redistribute computer programs. The FSF promotes the development and
use of free (as in freedom) software -- particularly the GNU operating
system and its GNU/Linux variants -- and free documentation for free
software. The FSF also helps to spread awareness of the ethical and
political issues of freedom in the use of software, and its Web sites,
located at fsf.org and gnu.org, are an important source of information
about GNU/Linux. Donations to support the FSF's work can be made at
<http://donate.fsf.org>. Its headquarters are in Boston, MA, USA.

  Media Contacts

Joshua Gay  
Campaigns Manager  
Free Software Foundation  
<campaigns@fsf.org>  

Matt Lee  
Campaigns Manager  
Free Software Foundation  
<campaigns@fsf.org>  

 ###


_______________________________________________
FSF And GNU Press mailing list <info-press@gnu.org>
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-press



(Log in to post comments)

FSF reboots its High Priority list with a grant and call for input

Posted Oct 3, 2008 2:04 UTC (Fri) by yarikoptic (subscriber, #36795) [Link]

imho besides the projects trying to replace non-free software, transparent legal support needs to be done. FSF indeed goes after the bad guys who fail to respect FOSS licenses, but we have no automagic protection against our innocent failures.

Coming from Debian developer perspective of view:
Licenses: FOSS world is full of different licenses which might be incompatible one direction or both. Simple relicensing is an option if there is a limited set of copyright holders. We have no automagic tools which would at least try to guess all mentioned licenses in the parts of code, check for their compatibility and compliance with the license of the shipped end-product... not to say (judging form SCO-vs-Linux history) that theoretically someone could build a tool to extract signatures (hell simple sha sums would be sufficient for the starting point) of code snippets and comparing them (and corresponding licenseS) to the known once in a central DB.

Trademarks: I know about few projects which got contacted by lawyers of big companies since apparently FOSS software was infringing a proprietary trademark (although the names for the projects were quite different)... sure thing poor scared developers preferred to simply pay a little fee under agreement of non-disclosure of the "deal" and changing the name of the project. But little portion of developers knows about existing trademarks in a particular field of applications... and generally speaking it is easy to check either the trademark is already registered at least in the states... e.g. would you know that 'junkyard' was trademarked by Apple some time ago? http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=johk...

So if I were FSF, I would just announce a competition for the creation of such a tool with a prize of 10k$ (somewhat like a fixed GSOC project ;-)). In the long term imho it would have greater impact and be more valuable to FOSS community.

Never happy :-)

Posted Oct 3, 2008 12:02 UTC (Fri) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link]

I know of two companies that provide such tools, specialising in free software. They charge for the service, but then again, this type of multi-licence analysis of combinations of many software packages is generally only needed by companies.

There's a touch of irony in seeing this comment when FSF announces funding for (specific) software developement, given that I've often seen FSF explaining the importance of licences and people replying, asking why FSF doesn't put more resources into general software development :-)

(Of course, just for completeness, I'll mention that their reason for not focusing on general software development is the same as FSFE's reason: the market value of free software already causes companies to employ thousands of developers for general software development. Non-profits like FSF and FSFE who can employ a handful of people must focus on the necessary work that we *can't* leave to corporations or "the market": awareness of the principles of freedom and the licences that make everyone play fair.)

FSF reboots its High Priority list with a grant and call for input

Posted Oct 5, 2008 17:33 UTC (Sun) by pabs (subscriber, #43278) [Link]

FOSSology does something similar to what you want:

http://fossology.org/

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds