Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc8
[Posted October 1, 2008 by corbet]
| From: |
| "Dave Airlie" <airlied-AT-gmail.com> |
| To: |
| "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
| Subject: |
| Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| Date: |
| Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:39:03 +1000 |
| Message-ID: |
| <21d7e9970809291939r51a728c8ye865e19dffac5bd6@mail.gmail.com> |
| Cc: |
| "Jiri Kosina" <jkosina-AT-suse.cz>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>,
jesse.brandeburg-AT-intel.com |
| Archive-link: |
| Article,
Thread
|
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> If it is X related then its both a kernel + X server issue, the e1000e
>> driver opens the barn door, the X server drives the horses through it.
>
> Are you sure? There was a mandriva report abou NVM corruption on an e100
> too (that one apparently just caused PXE failure, the networking worked
> fine).
Well from a purely empirical standpoint, I've been running new X
against that laptop for a long time,
and others have the same laptop, so I think its a problem with the
e1000e driver putting the card into a state which allows
X to do bad things. I think X maybe causing issues on other hw, like
e100 and some realtek.. Also when we say X I think it looks like Intel
driver interaction issues,
as I said I'm running the same stuff on my ATI gpu laptop with e1000e
and haven't had any problems.
But I'm leaving this up to Intel, I don't think HP will take it too
kindly if I keep returning my laptop.
Dave.
(
Log in to post comments)