Posted Sep 29, 2008 15:41 UTC (Mon) by ceplm (subscriber, #41334)
[Link]
I am not user of Debian (anymore), but non-free packages are very clearly differentiated not only by (quite opaque, true) vrms, but also by being in the separate branch of repostiroy. Eliminate non-free word from /etc/apt/sources.list and you won't get any of them.
How Debian handles it
Posted Sep 30, 2008 14:19 UTC (Tue) by cortana (subscriber, #24596)
[Link]
Indeed, non-free is not even included in a default installation. The user has to go out of his/her way to enable it; a tricky feat given that it's not mentioned in any obviously documented place as far as I can tell!
How Debian handles it
Posted Oct 9, 2008 21:37 UTC (Thu) by anton (subscriber, #25547)
[Link]
[...] it's not mentioned in any obviously documented
place as far as I can tell!
A number of packages recommend or suggest their documentation (which
is good), and then I find that apt-get doesn't know about this
package, so I google for, e.g. "debian package make-doc" and there it
says "[non-free]" in big letters. And if I actually want to have
documentation for pretty important packages, I have to put "non-free"
in my sources.list, even if I don't want any software that the real RMS considers non-free. And I am worried that some proprietary software
might slip in through this open door. I would appreciate it if Debian
did not just throw anything thats not DFSG-compliant into one common
"non-free" section. At least now I can check with vrms:
Non-free packages installed on smaug
emacs21-common-non-dfsg GNU Emacs shared, architecture independent, non-DFSG i
gawk-doc Documentation for GNU awk
gcc-4.1-doc documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++)
gcc-doc-base several GNU manual pages
glibc-doc-reference GNU C Library: Documentation
make-doc Documentation for the GNU version of the "make" utilit
6 non-free packages, 0.6% of 1033 installed packages.