2 Billion is NOTHING. It's a single acquisition. Sure they could lose a minor amount of money for years with the cash on hand but without growth the stock tanks and they become an acquisition target. The danger isn't SUN going out of business tomorrow it's that they will be bought out by someone or that they will slowly bleed themselves dry in much the same manner a certain company by the name of Santa Cruz Operation (The original one) or SGI did.
UNIX, the proprietary version, is dead. It was dieing when SGI and SCO got into trouble and it's long since dead. The only people still using it are the ones that were already using it. Based on trends most of them will switch to Linux by the end of the next decade as they upgrade. The proof of this is to look at IBM. AIX for the legacy customers, all systems can run Linux so the customers can switch to Linux as they convert applications from AIX. The proof is also in NASDAQ switching to an entire Linux backend a few years ago, a contract I might add that SUN used to hold and I believe IBM now holds. Legacy clients are switching, and eventually all of them will switch because the benefits of being vendor neutral are major.
Posted Sep 26, 2008 8:20 UTC (Fri) by trasz (guest, #45786)
[Link]
You might not have noticed, but IBM's position on Linux changed somewhat in the last years. Now it's just a AIX for the poor, with a lower functionality, performance, features etc, but free. Go speak with their sales.
Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? (New York Times)
Posted Sep 26, 2008 13:49 UTC (Fri) by k8to (subscriber, #15413)
[Link]
Maybe I am naïve, but I presume sales will always say dumb things that are half truths and there is no avoiding it. Do you know if this view is reflected by actions taken by other departments/groups?
Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? (New York Times)
Posted Sep 26, 2008 22:41 UTC (Fri) by trasz (guest, #45786)
[Link]
By other groups, do you mean engineering? No idea, I don't have any contact with these. What I do see is a shift from _sales_ trying to make clients migrate from AIX to Linux to _sales_ saying "actually, AIX is better".
Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? (New York Times)
Posted Sep 27, 2008 2:32 UTC (Sat) by k8to (subscriber, #15413)
[Link]
I meant engineering, professional services, product management, corporate officers.. anything!
Basically I view sales as completely unreliable.
If I were IBM's strategic planners, I would invest significantly in Linux but continue to charge a premium for AIX, which might result in sales saying AIX is better -- but this is just a theory, I don't know anything.
Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed? (New York Times)
Posted Sep 26, 2008 11:10 UTC (Fri) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501)
[Link]
In my mind Sun has the image of a company that sells propritary versions of free softwares. StartOffice, Solaris, MySQL, VirtualBox.
According to my very limited understanding, this is not exactly a sustainable model of operation in the long run. If so, what is thedir motivation to develop free software?