| |||||||||||||
ControversialControversialPosted Sep 18, 2008 2:03 UTC (Thu) by tseaver (subscriber, #1544)In reply to: Controversial by corbet Parent article: LPC: Fitting into the kernel ecosystem
Perhaps it would have been useful to note Greg's employer, as a tool to help readers evaluate his possible bias (I didn't know offhand that he was a Novell employee, for instance, untill reading mdz's followup).
(Log in to post comments)
First slide Posted Sep 18, 2008 7:30 UTC (Thu) by alex (subscriber, #1355) [Link]
I'd of thought his email on the first slide gave it away. And anyway he's showing the numbers even when Novell doesn't come up as high as certain distros.
First slide Posted Sep 21, 2008 0:27 UTC (Sun) by frazier (guest, #3060) [Link]
If you saw the slides you'd seen the suse.de email on the first slide, but if you were an LWN.net subscriber who read the article and didn't read the comments, you wouldn't have known the rest of the story. I like to think that the comments section is additional info, and not a place to be visited for a notable piece of the story that is missing.
First slide Posted Sep 22, 2008 0:50 UTC (Mon) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
I agree, it's unusual for a LWN piece to be this one-sided.
|
|||||||||||||