| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Waiting for Rockbox 3.0 - againWaiting for Rockbox 3.0 - againPosted Sep 11, 2008 10:04 UTC (Thu) by gevaerts (subscriber, #21521)In reply to: Waiting for Rockbox 3.0 - again by nix Parent article: Waiting for Rockbox 3.0 - again
There's actually more to it than that. Flash based mp3 players don't need much disk cache, so a lot of new mp3 players have much less RAM than previous generations. While rockbox can't handle a 384kB player currently, it's probably not impossible to strip it down enough to fit, and I don't see that happen with linux
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||