On libraries, I'll agree...somewhat. It's only recently been taken seriously as a language, so library support is uneven. But I rather like Javascript's semantics; it's like a curly-braced Lisp.
Posted Sep 3, 2008 20:09 UTC (Wed) by robertm (subscriber, #20200)
[Link]
Only without all the parts that make Lisp different from all the other scripting languages out there: a useful code/data correspondence; lexically scoped non-local returns; an object system based on generic functions instead of message passing; resumable exceptions; dynamically-scoped variables.
Javascript speed
Posted Sep 3, 2008 21:40 UTC (Wed) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047)
[Link]
Fair enough. Still, it's got closures and good function/object polymorphism.
Javascript speed
Posted Sep 4, 2008 8:05 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
And macros. Don't forget macros. (I suppose this is a consequence of
the 'useful code/data correspondence' that you did mention.)