TALPA strides forward
Posted Aug 29, 2008 16:45 UTC (Fri) by bfields
In reply to: TALPA strides forward
Parent article: TALPA strides forward
In practice I'm pretty sure that the mtime *would* always be updated, though, because in linux, in-memory inodes always get nanosecond-accurate timestamps.
That's not true. On a recent kernel try running a simple test program, that does e.g., write, stat, usleep(x), write, stat. You'll see that on ext2/ext3 "x" has to be at least a million (a second) before you see a difference in the two stats, and that on something like xfs, it has to be at least a thousand to ten thousand (a few milliseconds--the time resolution used is actually jiffies).
(On older kernels I think the ext2/3 behavior might look like xfs's; that was fixed because of problems with unexpected changes in timestamps (due to lost nanoseconds field) when an inode got flushed out of cache and then read back.)
to post comments)