In defense of Ubuntu reproach

Had I read further into the comments thread I would have foregone my posting, since it was so
obvious facts will not play any role.

My reason to respond now is two fold, a gratuitous attack of name calling by a <i>guest</l>
and noticing you seemed to purposely pretend to quote a question I did not ask.  Moreover, you
cite a known fact that bears no pertinence.

The issue is not if Canonical is making a profit, it is the implied exigencies implicit in
venture capital funding where the modus operandi is a pump and run up of the stock pricing so
the funding group can run off with the excess cash.  That was dishonest, at the very least.
You are oblivious to reasoned argument, hence, you should better converse with yourself and
save of the hearing the noise of your words.

Thank you, your silence is appreciated.