| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layerUdev rules and the management of the plumbing layerPosted Aug 17, 2008 16:38 UTC (Sun) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer by k8to Parent article: Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer
You need citations in order to demonstrate a pattern. I don't see that happening here. I don't see why someone trying to demonstrate that there is unwanted hostility would want to destroy his own argument by wanting RPM to completely ceast to exist either. Sure, there are differences and in some cases there are advantages to each of the solutions too. Remember, Intel switching from Ubuntu to Fedora claiming RPM to be a reason?
(Log in to post comments)
Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer Posted Aug 17, 2008 16:59 UTC (Sun) by daniels (subscriber, #16193) [Link] You continue to miss the point by such an astounding margin that I think it's better if we walk away and just forget this ever happened.
Udev rules and the management of the plumbing layer Posted Aug 18, 2008 13:17 UTC (Mon) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link] If you don't have a point worth understanding, feel free to walk away. I thought you had one while engaging in this conversation. Good luck.
|
|
||||||||||||