Pipe dreams...
Posted Aug 15, 2008 19:47 UTC (Fri) by
khim (subscriber, #9252)
In reply to:
Something going on with Fedora by MattPerry
Parent article:
Something going on with Fedora
It would be great if the Linux community could embrace these and
encourage ISVs to start packaging their programs themselves.
Sure. It'll create thriving support industry: since RedHat will point fingers to LSB, LSB to Adobe and Adobe back to RedHat we'll have complex scripts to install/uninstall packages, clean up stuff after bad packages and so on. And NOBODY will be able to help you without access to your system - since every system will be broken in it's own unique way. Now the only question arises: does creation of such industry is worthy goal or not? To me answer is simple: thnx, but no, thnx.
With such a system the Linux distro maintainers could focus their efforts on making great operating systems.
Nope. They'll have yet another sector of work: scripts and subsystems designed to cope with broken installation/uninstallation programs and malware removal tools.
Meanwhile, users would be free to mix and match software and versions without delving into the minutia of system administration.
Yup. If they don't actually care about runability of said software, that is.
They'd also be free of the burden of having to upgrade their entire
computing environment just to get Firefox 3.
Yup - the only way to run it will be to format harddrive and install new version of OS once Mozilla Foundation will decide to drop support for Fedora 7...
Sorry but this approach does not make Windows very happy...
LSB is DOA - it tries to solve problem even more complex then Microsoft's one and even Microsoft's problem is unsolvable. Simple one-binary programs without external dependencies work without LSB just fine and it's useless for complex programs. It all was discussed many-many times already: it does not work IRL and it'll not work in Linux too.
(
Log in to post comments)