LWN.net Logo

Interview: Qt Comes to Mozilla and Firefox (KDE.News)

KDE.News has an interview with Oleg Romaxa about porting Mozilla to Qt. "Developers from Nokia and Mozilla have been working hard to port the Mozilla Platform and Firefox to Qt and there are now some solid results available. An experimental build of Firefox Qt is available, and you can download the sources from Mozilla's mercurial repository. The plan is to merge the Qt branch into the central Mozilla branch to make the port official. KDE Dot News spoke to developer Oleg Romaxa from Nokia who came to Akademy 2008 from Finland."
(Log in to post comments)

Interview: Qt Comes to Mozilla and Firefox (KDE.News)

Posted Aug 14, 2008 1:18 UTC (Thu) by qg6te2 (guest, #52587) [Link]

A nice contribution, but is this really worth the effort considering that the GTK-Qt engine does a very good job with a lot less code?

Interview: Qt Comes to Mozilla and Firefox (KDE.News)

Posted Aug 14, 2008 21:26 UTC (Thu) by doodaddy (guest, #10649) [Link]

I get a little lost with QT.  I was interested in XUL which is Mozillas GUI engine.  It can do
a lot more than web browser GUIs and it can do it on many platforms.  But does this mean that
the QT license will apply and I will no longer be able to make a commercial interface without
paying QT?

Interview: Qt Comes to Mozilla and Firefox (KDE.News)

Posted Aug 15, 2008 8:23 UTC (Fri) by njs (subscriber, #40338) [Link]

XUL needs another platform library underneath it to interface with the GUI -- it has one
backend for working on windows, one backend for OSX, one backend for GTK+, and now one for Qt
as well.  Qt is basically an additional platform, that doesn't subtract from anything that
already exists; you still won't need to buy a Qt license to use XUL-over-GTK+, for instance.

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds