| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
IBM To Linux Desktop Developers: 'Stop Copying Windows' (InformationWeek)IBM To Linux Desktop Developers: 'Stop Copying Windows' (InformationWeek)Posted Aug 8, 2008 6:55 UTC (Fri) by dgm (subscriber, #49227)In reply to: IBM To Linux Desktop Developers: 'Stop Copying Windows' (InformationWeek) by janpla Parent article: IBM To Linux Desktop Developers: 'Stop Copying Windows' (InformationWeek)
I have had a look at it at http://www.guidebookgallery.org/screenshots/os2warp3 and I have to say that I'm completely unimpressed. What's great with it? It just looks like a beta of Windows 3.0.
(Log in to post comments)
IBM To Linux Desktop Developers: 'Stop Copying Windows' (InformationWeek) Posted Aug 8, 2008 13:14 UTC (Fri) by markhb (guest, #1003) [Link] It may look that way (and actually, Warp 4 had a better-looking screen), but it certainly didn't work that way. The whole thing was (is, if you want to look at eComStation) object-oriented, to the extent that, if you wanted to create a document on the desktop, you created one from a template (i.e., instantiated an object). WP's article on the Workplace Shell is here; read about the System Object Model as well. Plus, one neat UI trick that IBM patented and has never let go of: you could hold down your mouse button and drag in an irregular path through a folder window and only those icons you touched would be selected (as opposed to the rectangular-frame lasso that the others have).
IBM To Linux Desktop Developers: 'Stop Copying Windows' (InformationWeek) Posted Aug 9, 2008 1:25 UTC (Sat) by brouhaha (subscriber, #1698) [Link] if you wanted to create a document on the desktop, you created one from a template (i.e., instantiated an object)Another example of how everyone is actually following Apple's lead. That's exactly how the Lisa desktop worked. Xerox invented the GUI desktop, but almost all the innovation in it since 1983 has come from Apple, not Microsoft or IBM.
IBM To Linux Desktop Developers: 'Stop Copying Windows' (InformationWeek) Posted Aug 8, 2008 14:05 UTC (Fri) by dkite (guest, #4577) [Link] Windows 95 copied many ideas from OS/2. (yes, that is the vintage). The shell had an object model whose biggest problem wasn't the idea, but the implementation. The development process was quasi impossible and the interfaces were undocumented. The object model was separated from the underlying file system, which created problems with synchronisation. There were some very neat ideas I've yet to see implemented elsewhere. But the object model idea has been copied almost everywhere. Derek
|
|
||||||||||||