| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
OLS: Shuttleworth on free software developmentOLS: Shuttleworth on free software developmentPosted Aug 1, 2008 5:37 UTC (Fri) by njs (subscriber, #40338)In reply to: OLS: Shuttleworth on free software development by dlang Parent article: OLS: Shuttleworth on free software development
It's not a replacement for the maintainer, it's a replacement for your vcs's 'commit' command. No vcs that I'm familiar with has a commit command that will stop you from merging silly code to trunk either.
(Log in to post comments)
OLS: Shuttleworth on free software development Posted Aug 1, 2008 6:08 UTC (Fri) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link] with all the good choices of VCS out there, why would you choose to use one that required a replacement for it's commit command instead of just using one that doesn't require such a replacment?
OLS: Shuttleworth on free software development Posted Aug 1, 2008 6:27 UTC (Fri) by njs (subscriber, #40338) [Link] Because none of those VCSes have the functionality you want, i.e., to aid the desired workflow of all development on branches, clean merges to trunk, trunk always passes testsuite...?
|
|
||||||||||||