| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Microsoft to subborn subversion of the Apache Software Foundation (ars technica)Microsoft to subborn subversion of the Apache Software Foundation (ars technica)Posted Jul 28, 2008 3:37 UTC (Mon) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)In reply to: Microsoft to subborn subversion of the Apache Software Foundation (ars technica) by AlexHudson Parent article: Microsoft to sponsor the Apache Software Foundation (ars technica) On the contrary, an FAQ officially published by Microsoft constitutes a promise. If the original license didn't permit something, but an official document permits it, it provides a legal defense.
(Log in to post comments)
Microsoft to subborn subversion of the Apache Software Foundation (ars technica) Posted Jul 28, 2008 11:03 UTC (Mon) by AlexHudson (guest, #41828) [Link] "On the contrary"? I agree it provided a defence. I guess maybe I'm less certain that a paragraph in a FAQ trumps the actual legal text than you are...
|
|
||||||||||||