| |||||||||||||
Ubuntu, security response, and community contributionsUbuntu, security response, and community contributionsPosted Jul 23, 2008 19:10 UTC (Wed) by ddaa (guest, #5338)In reply to: Ubuntu, security response, and community contributions by mmcgrath Parent article: Ubuntu, security response, and community contributions
In your reply, the tone alone indicates that your are not interested in constructive discussion. Or if you are, you need to improve your writing skills. I acknowledge the effort you made in writing this comment. Sadly, as it is written, it would be very difficult to reply to while keeping the discussion meaningful.
(Log in to post comments)
Ubuntu, security response, and community contributions Posted Jul 23, 2008 19:13 UTC (Wed) by mmcgrath (subscriber, #44906) [Link] I'm a technician, not a writer. How about this: Ad hominem. Why attack the argument when you can attack the speaker? What a common fallacy you've just committed. No need to respond, your actions will speak louder, let us know when that launchpad is OSS. Have a nice day.
Ubuntu, security response, and community contributions Posted Jul 23, 2008 19:49 UTC (Wed) by ddaa (guest, #5338) [Link] How interesting. I made a point of attacking only your writing. I even suggested you might be of good faith but that you just failed at clear expression.
|
|||||||||||||