|| ||Andi Kleen <andi-AT-firstfloor.org>|
|| ||Alan Cox <alan-AT-lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>|
|| ||Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?|
|| ||Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:02:22 +0200|
|| ||Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar-AT-gmail.com>,
Alan Cox <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:27:56 +0000 (UTC)
> Parag Warudkar <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Andi Kleen <andi <at> firstfloor.org> writes:
>> > Or you could just do it like emacs or Solaris and simply use a single number.
>> No - because then those handful of Solaris supporters will get one more 'proof'
>> in support of their claims of Linux copying Solaris - first SystemTap copying
>> DTrace and now version numbers. See how we stand a risk of ending up convinced
>> we do not innovate?
> "Support" - dtrace is based on the IBM work it seems, and the IBM work
> predates Solaris dtrace by a long time, so actually you could argue
> Solaris copied Linux but shipped first ;)
Actually SLES9 shipped with IBM dprobes long before Solaris dtrace even
existed (and OS/2 did long before that). Back then the interest in it
was about zero though, which made SLES10 drop it again.
I think I was one of the very few users. Admittedly the early RPN
probes were also not particularly user friendly, but they worked.
I use this always as an example that even sophisticated users
like system administrators and kernel hackers are somewhat marketing driven.
 which BTW already supported user space probes
to post comments)