I'm not saying that truth is determined by who says it, nor have I ever.
What I'm saying is that *when a lot of evidence is invisible* (as was the
case with yours despite your protestations), people *will* use the
characters of the arguers in determining the probable truth or falsity of
Fallacy or not, *this is the way people think*, and if you want to have
anyone believe anything you say in future, remembering this might be wise.
Right now I wouldn't believe you if you said the sky was blue, unless
confirmed by independently available evidence. Your every action
screams 'bias' (because all we have available is your words, and your
words are every bit as rife with ad hominem attacks as they were when this