More DTrace envy
Posted Jul 9, 2008 22:43 UTC (Wed) by
Tet (subscriber, #5433)
In reply to:
More DTrace envy by bcantrill
Parent article:
More DTrace envy
good 'ole NIH in the Linux community
You could try to be less inflamatory. DTrace was hardly an original idea at Sun, either. You claim SystemTap is a "Linux-born DTrace-knockoff". By that logic, I could claim that DTrace is a Sun-born knockoff of the tracing work IBM did years ago. Sure, Sun have made some big improvements to the art of tracing, such as the D language, and a massive improvement it was too. As are some of the other innovations that have come from DTrace. But that's how the progress is made in this industry -- by building on work done by others. DTrace is not the be all and
end all of tracing, and claiming that NIH is the reason behind SystemTap
doesn't really help anything at the end of the day. Both DTrace and SystemTap
are useful products and have their place in the world. DTrace is good
enough to stand on its own technological merits, without the needless
put downs aimed at SystemTap (which pretty much everyone agrees is currently
lagging DTrace by some margin). You're rightfully proud of the work you've
done on DTrace, but perhaps a little less hostility to the competition
might be appropriate...
(
Log in to post comments)