| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)Posted Jul 5, 2008 15:41 UTC (Sat) by aquasync (subscriber, #26654)In reply to: The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica) by pimlottc Parent article: The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)
Yeah this would be a nice feature to have. DragonFly BSD's already got checkpointing, the linux equivalent I'm aware of was CryoPID, but don't think its as stable.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||