I'm planning to get one with the SSD, expand it with a SATA drive (it
apparently has the SATA port ready, used with the 2.5" HDD version, but
the SSD is hard-soldered), and install Gentoo from binary packages I've
merged into a chroot onto my main system.
I've wanted a decent freedomware based 120 gig-plus MP3 player for awhile.
For the longest time, they basically weren't available. Then they were
(160 gig ipod classic and etc), but only with proprietaryware firmware.
Then the Eee genre came out and I thought it was perfect, as it would be
be way MORE than an MP3 player, being an actual fully functional Linux
install with small but standard keyboard and all, but of course the SSD
was way to small and it had no direct SATA/PATA interface, and the 800 px
wide screen was good as an MP3 player but somewhat crippled as a full
Linux laptop display. Still, I was tempted to get it and hardware-hack it
with say four 32-gig USB flash drives hard-wired into it. There's a lot
of hardware-hacking info on the net for it, so it would have been
relatively easy. But I wondered what that might do to the already limited
(for an mp3 player) battery life. Chances are I could have it shut down
the display when using it as an mp3 player only, but I wasn't sure.
Then the bigger Eee came out, but it still didn't look to allow direct
SATA expansion and was rather more expensive. I looked at the various
competitors as they were announced as well, but couldn't find one that fit
what I needed, with good specs and etc. The hardware on the MSI Wind
looked decent, but they haven't been known for their Linux friendliness
and I rejected them a few years ago when looking at a main machine upgrade
because all their downloadables were MS exe format. Docs in (apparently)
self-extracting exes, not PDF or the like. BIOS updates, self extracting
exe, everything, executable. I wrote them at the time and told them
exactly why they were being crossed off my list. (I ended up with a Tyan
mobo; they had a Linux FAQ and support, multiple distro certified, even a
preconfigured sensors.conf for use with lm_sensors! I've been VERY happy
with them! =8^) While that particular MSI machine now ships with a Linux
preinstalled option, I still don't trust them and barring some extremely
good MSI/Linux reviews which I've yet to see, they are still off my list.
Then the Acer Aspire One was announced, and coming about the same time was
a bunch of associated PR about Acer planning to make Linux an option for
their entire line, over time. This was a very positive sign, and the
hardware was getting good reviews as well. One site even took it apart
and listed what was upgradable (including that SATA detail I was
particularly interested in) and what not.
As for the SATA upgrade, now that they announced a shipping upgrade to 120
gig, I'm thinking about getting it and forgetting about the hacking.
However, the SSD version still looks interesting, particularly if I couple
it with a 120 gig SSD drive like the SuperTalent 120 GIG 2.5" SATA format
SSD now available from newegg for <$600 (multi-bit per cell, but at that
price, can't complain).
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820... Or I
could go with an even bigger standard 2.5" SATA HDD. Haven't decided yet,
but I'm almost certainly going with the Acer Aspire One in /some/ form.
That's already decided.
Duncan
Acer's Linpus Linux Lite (Fedora) ultra portable laptop piles the pressure on Microsoft (FSM)
Posted Jul 5, 2008 7:30 UTC (Sat) by rvfh (subscriber, #31018)
[Link]
If you plan to recompile everything, I strongly recommend you use the Intel compiler with the
right options, it might bring you up to 30% performance improvement according to Intel...
The atom has got a 16-stage pipeline which is apparently unusual (I am no expert)...
HTH
Acer's Linpus Linux Lite (Fedora) ultra portable laptop piles the pressure on Microsoft (FSM)
Posted Jul 5, 2008 13:46 UTC (Sat) by jamesh (subscriber, #1159)
[Link]
Is that 30% compared to GCC targeting normal x86 chips or GCC targeting LPIA (Low Power Intel
Architecture)? There are enough differences that it makes sense to optimise differently for
Atom.
Acer's Linpus Linux Lite (Fedora) ultra portable laptop piles the pressure on Microsoft (FSM)
Posted Jul 5, 2008 17:13 UTC (Sat) by rvfh (subscriber, #31018)
[Link]
It's probably with the worst possible options of GCC, as I found it in the mouth of some of my
(non-free software loving) colleagues and on the Intel site ;)
More seriously, I can believe that ICC will have optimizations before GCC for this processor,
and would bet you can get this kind of improvement figures with some particular uses
(multimedia ?).
Not sure there'll be much difference on a web/file server though, as memory and disk access
will make the bulk of the response time.
Acer's Linpus Linux Lite (Fedora) ultra portable laptop piles the pressure on Microsoft (FSM)
Posted Jul 22, 2008 13:14 UTC (Tue) by Duncan (guest, #6647)
[Link]
The Intel compiler (ICC) is closed source. It's really quite simple. If
they don't respect my rights (as expressed in the FSF's four freedoms), I
don't trust them; if I don't trust them, their code doesn't go on my box.
(Yes, it's their hardware, but that's different, and at least it's a
relatively open spec.)
So even if gcc was an order of magnitude slower, I'd still be using either
it or some other open compiler. Of course, there'd be little point in my
purchasing the hardware in that case, then.
Even for those who will use ICC, however, at least according to a recent
thread on the topic on the Gentoo-dev list, it won't compile everything,
and there's additional complexity when using a mixed-compiled environment
due to imperfect "impedance matching".
The sig I use on the lists is relevant here:
--
Duncan
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman