| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)Posted Jul 3, 2008 11:56 UTC (Thu) by aleXXX (subscriber, #2742)In reply to: The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica) by Janne Parent article: The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)
Actually I think it might make more sense to compare KDE 4.0 with KDE 2.0 instead of 3.0. The port from 2 to 3 wasn't that hard. Alex
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||