| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)Posted Jul 2, 2008 20:37 UTC (Wed) by endecotp (guest, #36428)In reply to: The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica) by martinfick Parent article: The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)
I have entirely different ideas about how I want to radically change the way that my interaction with my computer happens. Our problem is that it's an enormous amount of work to even prototype novel interaction styles (or whatever you want to call them). It shouldn't be. I'm not sure where we went wrong though.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||