| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)Posted Jul 2, 2008 16:17 UTC (Wed) by juanjux (guest, #11652)Parent article: The critics are wrong: KDE 4 doesn't need a fork (ars technica)
KDE 4.0 was really frustrating. It barely deserved the "beta" tag (slow, crashed, full of problems... more alfa than beta IMHO), but KDE 4.1 is much much better and I've finally replaced my KDE 3+Beryl with it.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||