| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
A position statement on closed-source kernel modulesA position statement on closed-source kernel modulesPosted Jun 23, 2008 23:01 UTC (Mon) by arjan (subscriber, #36785)In reply to: A position statement on closed-source kernel modules by lrosen Parent article: A position statement on closed-source kernel modules
Larry, I know you're a lawyer so you think legal things... but this statement very deliberately is NOT about anything legal. It's about the consequences and effects that binary modules have for users and Linux.
(Log in to post comments)
A position statement on closed-source kernel modules Posted Jun 24, 2008 0:26 UTC (Tue) by lrosen (guest, #31972) [Link] To that extent, I agree with the published position statement. (I already said so!) I'm merely making the point that theirs is not a legal statement about device drivers and Linux, and ought not to be treated as such. /Larry
|
|
||||||||||||