| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
A position statement on closed-source kernel modulesA position statement on closed-source kernel modulesPosted Jun 23, 2008 14:36 UTC (Mon) by ctg (subscriber, #3459)In reply to: A position statement on closed-source kernel modules by tnoo Parent article: A position statement on closed-source kernel modules
It's quite undermining of the whole position - after all, it is _his_ kernel (or a least, commonly viewed as such).
(Log in to post comments)
A position statement on closed-source kernel modules Posted Jun 23, 2008 14:55 UTC (Mon) by ctg (subscriber, #3459) [Link] I meant to add: If you are aiming this at "corporates" (after all, who else develops closed source drivers) it should, ideally, be the statement of the Linux Foundation itself, as this would have far more weight that what, to the uninitiated, looks like a load of pseudo-random individuals.
|
|
||||||||||||