I had hoped the 100th post to this thread wouldn't have been from a troll who doesn't have one
iota of understanding about the meaning of "full disclosure." You talk a lot for someone who
is obviously not involved in security at all ("the underworld"..really?) and yet you choose to
disagree about things you admit you won't even bother to research yourself. You're the
epitome of a delusional zealot.
-Brad
Posted Jun 19, 2008 9:39 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
man_ls compliments you, and you respond that he's a delusional zealot.
This thread is giving me so *very* many examples of how not to communicate...
Not so fast
Posted Jun 19, 2008 14:34 UTC (Thu) by spender (subscriber, #23067)
[Link]
I'm guessing you were fooled by the juxtaposition of "spender" and "good examples." If you
had actually read his entire post in context, as I did, you wouldn't have replied in such a
way so as to blatantly expose your poor reading comprehension and "reply-without-reading"
mentality (which seems to be a common theme in your postings).
-Brad
Not so fast
Posted Jun 19, 2008 20:16 UTC (Thu) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091)
[Link]
nix is usually a very lucid commenter. Your post says quite more about you than about him.
Not so fast
Posted Jun 19, 2008 21:30 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Hay fever drugs *are* kind of turning my mind off at the moment, but
still...