| |||||||||||||
"Stable" kernel 2.6.25.7 released"Stable" kernel 2.6.25.7 releasedPosted Jun 17, 2008 15:24 UTC (Tue) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616)In reply to: "Stable" kernel 2.6.25.7 released by nix Parent article: Stable kernel 2.6.25.7 released
i read what you wrote but i think we're having a definition crisis of some sort ;). how do you define 'coordination'? somewhere above i told you it doesn't take much in a close-knit circle of people who belong to the same social group anyway. if you mean written edicts issued in secret or something like that, then it's definitely not that. if you mean the 'see what Linus does, do as Linus does' kind of 'coordination', then you may call it that but it doesn't make it so. ever heard of unspoken/unwritten rules that people understand and abide by? doesn't make them all conspirative, does it? nevertheless, it can still be bad practice and in this case, it is. but in the end, you know what, whatever word makes you happy. can you now make the next step and actually do something about checking the facts out for yourself?
(Log in to post comments)
"Stable" kernel 2.6.25.7 released Posted Jun 17, 2008 15:42 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] I can't do that because the facts are largely on private lists I don't have access to. (That's why I trusted that the facts were as you stated.)
"Stable" kernel 2.6.25.7 released Posted Jun 17, 2008 15:47 UTC (Tue) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616) [Link] > I can't do that because the facts are largely on private lists I don't > have access to. and what prevents you from asking for them? are you not curious? don't you think that it may be a good idea to make them public? or just afraid of finding your beliefs shattered a bit?
"Stable" kernel 2.6.25.7 released Posted Jun 17, 2008 18:09 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] Mostly I'm not interested enough to bother people over it (and I have other things to do). If the holes get fixed, it's good enough for me personally...
|
|||||||||||||