"Stable" kernel 2.6.25.6

OK, you're resorting to argument from authority. There's absolutely no 
point talking to you at all, is there?

(And no, I'm not going to go around randomly accusing kernel hackers of 
coverups and conspiracies. You're the one arguing that point and referring 
to secret evidence to 'support' your claim, not me.)


(I'd agree that the various private security lists should have delayed 
public archives. Transparency is good, and the only reason to keep those 
lists private is to prevent the bad guys from responding before the 
distros do, so after they've responded there's no point keeping the 
traffic secret anymore.)