News and Editorials
Fedora's Packager Sponsors Responsibility Policy
By Rebecca Sobol
May 28, 2008
A Linux distribution is really the sum of its packages. The more packages
that are available, the more useful it becomes for a wide range of needs.
Case in point,
Debian has some
20,000 plus packages
available to it's users, and to the wide variety of Debian-based
distributions.
Fedora doesn't have quite as many
packages available (yet), but the project hasn't been working at it for
nearly as long either. Of course having thousands of packages available is
no good if they won't interact well with each other. A distribution isn't
just a collection of random binary packages. Packaging guidelines are
critical for ensuring that any package you (the user) installs, works well
with the rest of your system.
Fedora is working toward having an ever growing number of volunteers
maintaining an ever growing number of packages, and still having an
integrated distribution that works whether you want the "Everything Spin"
or one of the highly specialized Spins, or something in between.
One part of making that happen is having sponsors for new volunteers, and
coming up with a policy to guide these sponsors. A draft version of the Packager Sponsors
Responsibility Policy was posted to Fedora-devel late last week. The wiki version contains some additions and clarifications.
With the new policy, sponsors are maintainers with a good record of package
maintenance and have shown a willingness to review packages and assist
others. Sponsors act as mentors for new contributors, as package reviewers
and ultimately they are responsible for making sure that bugs are fixed in
their sponsored packages.
The policy also indicates some conditions where a sponsorship might be
revoked:
A maintainer that no longer wishes to contribute to Fedora, a maintainer
that refuses to follow guidelines, or irreconcilable differences between
the maintainer and the Sponsor. In this event it is the responsibility of
the Sponsor to orphan the maintainers packages, and do any other needed
cleanups.
Like all such policies, it will evolve over time, but all in all it is a
good start to a policy that should help new maintainers get involved with
the Fedora project.
Comments (none posted)
New Releases
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 announced
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 has been
released.
"
Today we released the second update to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. As with earlier minor releases, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 comes with a broad set of bug fixes, updated hardware support capabilities, quality improvements, and a set of new software features that have been backported from upstream open source projects to the Enterprise Linux 5 code base."
Comments (9 posted)
Distribution News
SUSE Linux and openSUSE
Thesis on openSUSE Published
The openSUSE News
points
to a recently published thesis on "Managing Firm-Sponsored Open Source
Communities" which details the collaboration between Novell and the
openSUSE community. A summary of the study, the full thesis, and pictures
are available at
Jan Fredrik's
Weblog. "
Ch 4 Empirical-findings -- From here on we wander into
the world of Novell and the openSUSE project. Based largely on interviews
with developers, managers and community members, this chapter presents some
of the history of the openSUSE project, the software products, the
development process and the openSUSE community." (Thanks to
Stephan Binner)
Comments (6 posted)
New Distributions
FAN (Fully Automated Nagios)
FAN (Fully
Automated Nagios) aims to provide a CD based on CentOS in order to simplify
installation of Nagios and other Nagios tools. Tools installed by FAN are:
Linux, MySQL, Nagios, Nagios Plugins, NaReTo, NagVis, Centreon, Net-SNMP
and NDOUtils. Version 0.3 was recently
released.
Comments (none posted)
Freezy Linux
Freezy Linux is a free,
easy-to-use Linux-based operating system for the home. The initial
version, 1.0, is based on Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron and the GNOME desktop
environment. It comes as a live CD which can be installed to the hard
drive if desired.
Comments (none posted)
RedPost Launches Wicker: A Customized Ubuntu for Digital Signs and Photo Frames
RedPost inc. has announced the launch of Wicker, their customized version
of Ubuntu that runs on their digital signs. "
Eric Kanagy, CEO, led
the project to develop Wicker. "We've customized Ubuntu to make it work
like a digital sign or photo frame and we figured we may as well offer it
to the world. It's nothing too fancy -- it just does what it's supposed to
do.""
Full Story (comments: 4)
Distribution Newsletters
Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter #92
The Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter for May 24, 2008 covers the Ubuntu Developer
Summit Intrepid Ibex, Ubuntu Live canceled, new Ubuntu Membership Approval
Boards to meet, new Ubuntu Contributing Developers, a new Launchpad
podcast, and much more.
Full Story (comments: none)
OpenSUSE Weekly News/23
This edition of the
OpenSUSE Weekly
News looks at openSUSE 11.0 Beta 3, People of openSUSE: Wolfgang
Koller, Status Updates, Duncan Mac-Vicar P.: The greatest unknown openSUSE
11.0 package management feature, Lukás Ocilka: Function Keys
in YaST ncurses Frontend, andi.opensuse-id.org: KDE 4.0.4 on openSUSE 10.3,
and more.
Comments (none posted)
Gentoo Monthly Newsletter: 26 May 2008
This edition of the Gentoo Monthly Newsletter covers Gentoo Foundation
reinstated, Council Meeting Summary, upcoming events, an Interview with
Google Summer of Code Student Eric Thibodeau, and much more.
Full Story (comments: none)
DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 254
The
DistroWatch
Weekly for May 26, 2008 is out. "
An interesting week that
brought two big enterprise Linux updates (SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP2 and
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2, both released on the same day) and a number
of smaller distribution releases, of which Absolute Linux 12.1, Ultimate
Linux 1.8 and TinyMe 2008.0 seem the most impressive. But the big focus of
the coming weeks is undoubtedly openSUSE 11.0 - the most innovative Linux
distribution release for some time. Do help with testing, though, if you
can. In the news section, Paul Frields and Mark Shuttleworth talk to
various publications about their respective distributions, CentOS explains
why it takes three weeks to build a new version of its distribution,
Xubuntu plans to add some of the much-requested features into Intrepid
Ibex, and Famelix GNU/Linux receives undue attention from Microsoft's
anti-piracy body. Also not to be missed: our first look at OpenSolaris
2008.05 and an update on Zenwalk's package management utility,
Netpkg."
Comments (none posted)
Interviews
Interview with Fedora Project Leader Paul Frields
Softpedia has an
interview with Fedora Project Leader Paul Frields covering the release of Fedora 9, plans for Fedora 10, and some thoughts about working with other distributions. "
Well, I should point out that FOSS isn't a simple competition; it's more like 'co-opetition' – so adopting an 'us vs. them' attitude ends up being not very constructive or healthy. It's much healthier to build FOSS by having a robust policy for dealing with upstream software communities. The Fedora policy of working closely and vigorously with these upstream groups means we're not just consuming that work, we're contributing to it actively. By comparison, simply creating patches in our own distribution creates a maintenance drag, as well as an uneven experience for FOSS users who work on a number of platforms. Having the software work differently on each distribution doesn't reassure users about how well FOSS works. When we find problems, we send the solutions, via patches and other forms, back to the upstream communities and work with them to get them included where they make sense. That improves FOSS for *everyone*, and not just Fedora."
Comments (none posted)
Distribution reviews
Review: Lightweight Linux distributions (Abandoned Zone)
From the Abandoned Zone (blog)
comes this review/comparison
of several lightweight Linux distributions: Arch 2007.08-2, Damn Small
Linux 4.2.5, Puppy 4.0, TinyMe Test7-KD, Xubuntu 8.04, and Zenwalk 5.0.
"
After installation the system was rebooted. Boottime was measured
from Grub to Desktop (login information was entered as quickly as possible)
and I ran glxgears to see how well my graphics card was working (this was a
problem in the past). Than I took a quick look how well the hardware is
detected, which default software is installed and how it performs."
Comments (none posted)
Page editor: Rebecca Sobol
Next page: Development>>