| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
LiMo vs AndroidLiMo vs AndroidPosted May 17, 2008 11:03 UTC (Sat) by drag (subscriber, #31333)In reply to: LiMo vs Android by pabs Parent article: Verizon joins open Linux mobile group LiMo (CrunchGear)
It all depends on how locked down the phone is. They have to release the source code to the Linux kernel and the low-level userland (busybox, I assume), but there is nothing that says that they have to let you modify the phone's software. If they turn it into a TiVo then that's going to suck. Given their track record I have my doubts that it's going to be open. Oh well.
(Log in to post comments)
LiMo vs Android Posted May 17, 2008 18:10 UTC (Sat) by rfunk (subscriber, #4054) [Link] Which "they" are you talking about, Google or OpenMoko?
LiMo vs Android Posted May 18, 2008 8:10 UTC (Sun) by muwlgr (guest, #35359) [Link] You would guess, Google, of course.
LiMo vs Android Posted May 18, 2008 15:57 UTC (Sun) by rfunk (subscriber, #4054) [Link] But the whole point of Android is for people to add third-party apps on top of their Java stack. True, they may not let you mess with lower-level stuff, but I don't want to be messing in C or C++ for my cell phone.
|
|
||||||||||||