I was representing FSFE, and was at an SME breakfast because FSFE is a member of the CEA-PME
SME Federation.
No one questioned my assertion that SMEs were against software patents. Indeed, the chair
confirmed it (which surprised me since he was a pro-swpat MEP).
...but maybe he would say he's against software patents but that he supports
computer-implemented inventions. To have a meaningful discussion about this, you really have
to be able to agree on terminology at the beginning :-/
The best way to do that is to bring a few specific patents and then avoid existing terms
completely by just talking about "this type of patent". Q&A sessions don't really give you
the opportunity for that.
Still, if we stay quiet, we give the Commission a justification to say that they discussed X
issue and nobody complained about software patents. So even when we can't make a difference,
it's useful to raise an objection.