Since my Verizon LG phone is ancient and falling apart, and I escaped the
2-year contract many years ago, I've been looking at the newly-forming
options for phones. For a Linux geek who values openness, there appear to
be two major options -- Google's Android, and this LiMo thing.
After looking into the two after this announcement, I noticed a striking
difference: Android is all about promoting outside innovation and
third-party development. LiMo is all about making life easier for the
phone vendor.
I think I'll keep waiting for Android phones, thank you very much.
Posted May 16, 2008 5:28 UTC (Fri) by pabs (subscriber, #43278)
[Link]
I wouldn't count on Android phones being open enough. I'll be getting an OpenMoko Freerunner
myself (as my first mobile phone ever).
LiMo vs Android
Posted May 17, 2008 11:03 UTC (Sat) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
[Link]
It all depends on how locked down the phone is.
They have to release the source code to the Linux kernel and the low-level userland (busybox,
I assume), but there is nothing that says that they have to let you modify the phone's
software.
If they turn it into a TiVo then that's going to suck. Given their track record I have my
doubts that it's going to be open. Oh well.
LiMo vs Android
Posted May 17, 2008 18:10 UTC (Sat) by rfunk (subscriber, #4054)
[Link]
Which "they" are you talking about, Google or OpenMoko?
LiMo vs Android
Posted May 18, 2008 8:10 UTC (Sun) by muwlgr (guest, #35359)
[Link]
You would guess, Google, of course.
LiMo vs Android
Posted May 18, 2008 15:57 UTC (Sun) by rfunk (subscriber, #4054)
[Link]
But the whole point of Android is for people to add third-party apps on top of their Java
stack.
True, they may not let you mess with lower-level stuff, but I don't want to be messing in
C or C++ for my cell phone.