Not commenting code is usually bad, but not commenting code that uses a 'clever trick' seems
to me as recipe for disaster. And that's exactly what happened here.
Posted May 15, 2008 10:41 UTC (Thu) by erich (subscriber, #7127)
[Link]
actually it was a different instance of the line - and that line actually is a pretty
straightforward use of the Message Digest API - where the harm occurred.
The place where "likely uninitialized data" was used can be removed safely.
Still I have to agree with you that the code should have been better documented.