Re: changeset: Make forced module loading optional
[Posted May 7, 2008 by corbet]
| From: |
| Rusty Russell <rusty-AT-rustcorp.com.au> |
| To: |
| Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
| Subject: |
| Re: changeset: Make forced module loading optional |
| Date: |
| Tue, 6 May 2008 04:42:12 +1000 |
| Message-ID: |
| <200805060442.12440.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |
| Cc: |
| linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org,
Jon Masters <jonathan-AT-jonmasters.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam-AT-ravnborg.org> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article,
Thread
|
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 03:07:03 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > BTW, for the peanut gallery: I don't recommend modversions: it's not
> > reliable in detecting all differences, nor being stable when there are no
> > real differences.
...
> So I agree that modversions is not "reliable", but I think that the
> alternative is often even *less* reliable, so I find the "don't recommend
> modversions" comment to be pretty debatable.
Kids: do not shove random modules into your kernel. Just because Linus does
something doesn't make it a good idea. modversions tries to be clever, but
don't count on it; you want module signing for this (where did those patches
go?)
BTW, I'm fascinated and a little nausiated that you ignore initrds. We've
moved half the kernel brains to userspace with udev, initrd and modules; it's
really unfair that you're not sharing all that why-won't-my-machine-boot
love.
Cheers,
Rusty.
(
Log in to post comments)