|
Going it alone, the relevance of the vendors diminishesGoing it alone, the relevance of the vendors diminishesPosted May 7, 2008 14:05 UTC (Wed) by alex (subscriber, #1355)Parent article: How not to sell embedded Linux
One problem the embedded Linux vendors have is they are still trying to behave in proprietary ways - and with Linux at the core of your embedded project it becomes increasingly clear the vendors are trying to lock you into them. The last embedded project I did with Linux (in fact the first I did) we held the option of going for vendor supplied kernel open in case we needed harder real-time support. In the end it turned out we didn't need that so all they had left to offer was fancy (proprietary) GUIs and distro's which would have tied the project to the vendor if we had used them. Unless you are going for a heavily configured PC type application rolling your own distro isn't that hard and it means you have a good understanding of what is in your system and why. I suspect as more and more RT and embedded patches make it into the mainline kernel (windriver's 81 patches seeming rather poultry) the value proposition of embedded Linux companies will look increasingly weak. There is a role for them in the space somewhere but they need to prove their worth.
(Log in to post comments)
Going it alone, the relevance of the vendors diminishes Posted May 7, 2008 15:20 UTC (Wed) by ewan (subscriber, #5533) [Link] (windriver's 81 patches seeming rather poultry)That's why they sound so scared. They're clearly chicken.
Going it alone, the relevance of the vendors diminishes Posted May 8, 2008 21:45 UTC (Thu) by im14u2c (subscriber, #5246) [Link] I suspect fowl play.
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.