I've been using reiser3 for years now on all my systems. I know it's still maintained, but
seeing
"Reiserfs is nearing the end of its run" being written makes me think I should switch to
something
else. but what? when I switched from ext3 to reseirfs I saw a decent performance increase on
the
types of files I deal with (lots of small files), so I don't really want to go back to that.
any
suggestions?
Posted May 5, 2008 19:11 UTC (Mon) by cventers (subscriber, #31465)
[Link]
I was using reiserfs for the same reason until some little bit of
corruption ballooned into kernel panics and random reboots. I switched
back to ext3 and I've been happy since.
ext3 hasn't stood still
Posted May 6, 2008 16:49 UTC (Tue) by james (subscriber, #1325)
[Link]
ext3 hasn't stood still over the years -- there have been a number of projects to improve performance. A quick Google suggests theselinks.
So your earlier experience may no longer be accurate.
James.
what other filesystem?
Posted May 8, 2008 19:30 UTC (Thu) by zooko (subscriber, #2589)
[Link]
For some of my current use cases, the fact that reiserfs hasn't been improved in years is a
good thing -- that means that relatively few bugs have been added to it in recent years. ;-)
Regards,
Zooko
what other filesystem?
Posted May 8, 2008 19:31 UTC (Thu) by zooko (subscriber, #2589)
[Link]
Oh, following up to my own post because I thought I should link to the allmydata.org Tahoe
Least-Authority Filesystem Bibliography page:
http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/wiki/Bibliography
where I just added links to four papers analyzing safety of several filesystems including
reiserfs.
what other filesystem?
Posted May 13, 2008 11:15 UTC (Tue) by zmi (guest, #4829)
[Link]
That was my first thought also. Being from Austria/Europe, I just hear now
that Reiser murdered, and I do not have any more information about that
and also don't really care too much. Seems like they believe she's dead
but nobody found her. But that's another story.
"Reiserfs is nearing the end of its run" is what strikes me. I've been
using it for years, and had some very bad and nasty hardware issues that
destroyed hard disk contents, but could get back most of the data on it.
The biggest issue was once a broken RAID controller decided to rebuild a
RAID with the wrong disk. He thought the new empty disk was good and one
existing disk was the spare disk, and rebuilt RAID-5 checksums. Which,
obviously, simply destroyed whatever useful was there. That way, the first
~20-30GB of the 500GB RAID contents were completely destroyed, including
partition tables etc. With "reiserfck --rebuild-tree" I got most
information back and that's why I stick to this filesystem. I know now how
to get it back in case of problems, no matter how speedy other filesystems
could be, that is the most interesting point for me.
Speed doesn't matter anymore once your data is gone.