Exactly... Red Hat too could piss away money... but you see, the are trying to make money, not
lose it. My point was that Red Hat's point was valid... that no one has really made any money
selling Desktop Linux because the market isn't ready yet... and that until someone does (the
example I gave was the seeming contenter Ubuntu/Canonical) it looks like Desktop Linux as a
commercial product... isn't doable.
Desktop Linux as a free product, now that has been doable for a long, long time now.
Posted Apr 17, 2008 21:20 UTC (Thu) by wtogami (subscriber, #32325)
[Link]
> the are trying to make money, not lose it. My point was that
> Red Hat's point was valid... that no one has really made any
> money selling Desktop Linux because the market isn't ready yet
I think this is a misrepresentation or misunderstanding of what Red Hat's blog post said. It
was business sustainability reasons for Red Hat to choose not to create a "traditional desktop
product for the consumer market". The blog post said nothing about linux desktop being "not
ready yet".