| |||||||||||||
How about a distro-provided bisection facility?How about a distro-provided bisection facility?Posted Apr 16, 2008 11:47 UTC (Wed) by michaeljt (subscriber, #39183)In reply to: How about a distro-provided bisection facility? by michaeljt Parent article: Bisection divides users and developers
Or perhaps I am thinking too complicated - some sort of binary diffs should do the trick just as well or better.
(Log in to post comments)
How about a distro-provided bisection facility? Posted Apr 16, 2008 14:05 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] Both of these have the problem that kernel configurations are wildly variable and capable of enormous variation. This would only be practical for a limited set of distro-compiled kernels (thus with known .configs), but it might work for them, and that would still be quite useful (I guess it's more likely that someone who can build their own kernel can bisect it for bugs as well).
How about a distro-provided bisection facility? Posted Apr 16, 2008 14:10 UTC (Wed) by michaeljt (subscriber, #39183) [Link] I think that the original poster was indeed talking about distribution kernels.
|
|||||||||||||